We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Take that chip off of your shoulder, dhindhora pitna band karo and maybe spend that energy trying to highlight this systemic issue.
Honestly, hiring is happening, but firms are being quite selective with recruitment because of the 2023 bunch, who weren't exactly quite meritorious with work either. It seems the quality of freshers has deteriorated quite considerably which has caused partners to prefer laterals. The market is actually pretty good in India and is swooned to grow soon, hence isn't to blame.
For emphasis, I repeat, the 2023 batch was really really disappointing in several firms I know, would like to know comments from partners in other firms.
No KT clause always there but implied ?? Then tell me how people got offers with active KTs ?
Did I say the firm has to necessarily look at 80-100 CVs ? No.
Ask for ranklist and sort by % weed out KTs - To my knowledge as a then PlaceCom member the only firms that enforce this are the Cyril brothers.
Weed out KTs - again how did people with active KTs end up getting offers then ? Let's shed light on that,,, because then a few rotten truths will come to light. Asking firms to background verify every potential candidate is an impossible ask but hiding KTs becomes a whole lot easier when you're running the placement ship so to speak (and the verification process happens on that end).
You do you
Granted there are people who genuinely deserved those offers for working their ass off but let's be real here.
Also from the cumulative placed numbers let's bifurcate between people who got offers through cold emails/ direct applications which the PlaceCom loves to tout as their own effort.
Before anyone contests the "fake" allegations made here - for this year the PlaceCom requests not only certificates but emails from verified handles for internships and firms have also added a "no KT clause".
It is what it is 😔😔