We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
you need to break down what is needed to do good in clat and why people who barely prepare get nls
clat basically (afaik in my days) used to test mainly your reading comp, your reading speed, your wide vocab and your awareness in general
I belive if you are someone like me (small town, 4/10 education, did not read as a kid) you cannot make up your reading comp, reading speed and vocab in one year. or if you do you will have to mainly focus on practicing speed reading, anki vocab cards (I had like 1-2k). for gk read the hindu columns
remember, people who you are competing w almost always are obsessive readers who have been reading since they were kids, they basically have years of practise above you. do your best. i remember clat prep or something was good, I did cl and even le, and much more. not a lot of diff, at the end you never know what comes in clat. best of luck, I'm rooting for you