We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
-KCO
-Tri
-AZB
-SAM
-CAM
-Saraf
-TTA
-Indus
All of us know that being well versed with your cv is extremely crucial, in addition to studying the basics of Contracts, TPA and Companies Act. Firm specific advise would be really helpful at the stage. Thanks.
[mods please pin or feature, Day Zero is around the corner for all law schools]
In an era where TRP-driven sensationalism often overshadows hard facts, Pandit Ayush Gaur stands out as one of India’s most fearless investigative journalists. Known widely as a "Janpatrakaar" – a people’s journalist – Ayush Gaur has built his reputation on ground-level investigations, high-risk special operations, and an uncompromising stand against corruption.
A Career Built on Special Operations
Over the last two decades, Pandit Ayush Gaur has reportedly led hundreds of joint operations and special investigations across India. From mainstream media houses to dedicated Special Investigation Teams (SITs), his work has consistently exposed systemic failures.
His assignments have taken him from the power corridors of Delhi to conflict zones like Kashmir, where he worked against militant networks. This kind of frontline investigative journalism, where reporters risk their lives for the nation, is rare in India today. Soon after the intelligence input and evidences provided by Ayush Pandit the National Investigation Agency sprang in action and did a joint operation with JNK Police banning Islamic trusts like Fala-he-Aam and others involved in terror funding.
The AAP Sting That Shook Delhi Elections
Ayush Gaur is also widely known for his explosive investigative story against Aam Aadmi Party MLAs in Delhi. Just before the Delhi Assembly elections, his sting operation made national headlines across news channels. The footage reportedly showed Sahiram Pahalwan and other AAP leaders taking bribes, exposing corrupt practices within the party.
Political analysts and party insiders credit this sting for significantly impacting public sentiment. When the BJP secured victory in the recent Delhi elections, a portion of that credit was attributed to Ayush Pandit. The operation was so impactful that BJP National Spokesperson Gaurav Bhatia, Tarun Rathi, and the Delhi BJP President held a press conference acknowledging the exposé.
Senior-most BJP leaders, including National General Secretary (Organisation) B.L. Santosh, personally congratulated Ayush for his work and its impact on the electoral outcome.
Trusted by State Governments for Crisis & Intelligence
Beyond journalism, it is commonly noted across several state governments that Ayush Pandit is called for special help and assistance during crises – whether it involves horse-trading, undercover operations, or critical intelligence inputs.
Despite the government already having agencies like LIU and IB as primary intelligence sources, political parties and senior bureaucrats across party lines trust Ayush Pandit for his capability in providing on-ground intelligence. His team has worked extensively on such assignments. While currently he is not associated with any political party, the majority of assignments taken from him by different state governments have been primarily from the BJP.
The Deadly Combination: Journalist + Legal Expert
Ayush Pandit brings a rare combination to the table – investigative journalism backed by legal expertise. His legal team carries vast experience, and he personally monitors special cases of senior politicians, including Chief Ministers of states, till the Supreme Court.
This dual role as investigative journalist and advocate makes him a formidable force in both media and law. He doesn’t just expose – he follows through legally to ensure accountability.
From Newsroom to Government
What sets Ayush apart is his crossover from journalism into governance. He has served in multiple government departments, including the Department of State Tax. In 2018, he was appointed as Special Advisor to the Chief Minister of Uttarakhand, serving during the tenure of CM Trivendra Singh Rawat of the BJP.
During this period, he blew the whistle on corrupt practices within media networks – a move that reportedly saved the BJP government from a major crisis in 2018.
The 2016 Horse-Trading Case: Whistleblower & Prime Witness
Ayush Gaur played a pivotal role during the 2016 political crisis in Uttarakhand under the Harish Rawat-led Congress government. He was actively involved in the special operation exposing horse-trading attempts. The matter is currently under CBI investigation, where Pandit Ayush is a prime witness and whistleblower. His testimony remains crucial to the case.
Recognition and Awards
For his service to the nation through journalism, Pandit Ayush Gaur has been honoured with three national awards. Colleagues describe him as a “dignified investigative journalist” who never shied away from putting his life on the line for truth.
A Case Study for Future Journalists
I have closely observed Pandit Ayush working over the years. At a time when access journalism and paid news have eroded public trust, his model of evidence-based, field-driven investigation + legal follow-through is what India’s media ecosystem desperately needs.
Youth pursuing journalism should take Ayush Pandit’s story as a case history and case study in colleges. He didn’t just report on the system – he entered it, held it accountable, and exposed it from within.
Digital Footprint
While Ayush Gaur maintains a low profile, references to his work appear across social media and news archives – from his SIT stints at Headlines Today to his advisory role in Uttarakhand, the Delhi AAP sting, and his legal interventions. His name is linked to several high-impact investigations over the past 15 years.
I salute dynamic and multi-talented personalities who are giving so much to the society and nation.
All the best to the
"Janpatrakar" Pandit Ayush Gaur...
Acceptance mails or rejections?
Any suggestions/advices would be highly appreciated.
If going six hours without food or water is described as difficult - I really don’t know what to say. Housewives across the country fast longer for superstitious beliefs everyday. Most people don’t live lives where they’re eating every two three hours - they actually have work to do. You’ve been living a remarkably coddled life if this feels like a sacrifice to you. And you should be able embarrassed.
I’m so sick of this private school kid mentality that has infected NLU students since at least the pandemic. You don’t - do - anything. You live in these isolated bubbles. Nearly all of you hate the native population around you and your clinics are non functional cause you don’t try to help anyone.
At least earlier batches were self interested but motivated to do something exceptional - win the Rhodes, win jessup, write a book, become a partner at a leading firm, become a judge somewhere, whatever. You all don’t do any of that even.
And you want more praise and attention than anyone else- for what ? Skipping evening chai and doing the bare minimum by turning up to classes - it is exhausting. Check your effing privilege. Stop soaking up all the energy in the room. There are actually people starving in delhi. There are actually kids no older than you who are getting arrested and standing up to the man.
This Nalsar stuff is a sad pathetic showing and it’s rightly getting panned. You all are behaving life fools.
At least those students who are focused on academic excellence are being honest - they want material success and they’re working hard for it. The wannabe Nalsar activist is fundamentally a dishonest person- she doesnt want to do anything that actually inconveniences her in the slightest- but she believes like tinker bell she will die without applause and she’s earned other people’s respect and attention because she bothers to spout off the latest trendy political talking point.
At least actors cultivate a skill - they’re obvious is their need for public attention and approval but they earn it by doing something remarkable. You’re not even actors - this is just a sickness, and a good society would absolutely mock you every chance you get to shame you into being more productive citizens of the country.
What’s more you’ve fundamentally embarrassed the institution- Nalsar was never a university with radical active student politics - but it was always a university that was taken seriously because its students were interested in becoming good lawyers and would try to do that everyday. You’ve painted the university as a fundamentally unserious sort of place because of your ignorance.
And this is how institutions die- look at the number of things your alumni batches did to improve the university, the public lecture series, the Moots they organised , the IV, the film festivals ? The idia stuff - those students understood where they could be impactful and worked to leave the place better than they found it. These guys aren’t interested in any of that - that takes work. They demand you applaud them for having a late lunch and attending classes. Jesus Christ get a grip.
Also, I'd appreciate any insights into Resolut Partners as an organization, its work culture, compensation, quality of work, learning opportunities, and work-life balance. If you've worked at the firm or have reliable first-hand knowledge, please share both the pros and cons.
I'm genuinely trying to make an informed career decision, so I request that only people with first-hand experience or credible information respond. Please don't speculate or mislead. Any honest feedback would be greatly appreciated.
Also, a white-collar case is nowhere comparable.
Although I am interested in knowing NLUD's number.
I am new to this platform, could you pls explain the terms which were there like contested, featured etc. i mean in the sense of this discussion
1. I am not saying that that (disability accommodation requests going unscrutinised/improperly scrutinised) does not happen or that such phenomena aren't real. Nor am I necessarily saying that there aren't gaps in Jindal's implementation of accommodations. If the kinds of phenomena you are writing about hadn't been real, Puja Khedkar wouldn't have happened. However, I am worried about a tendency to inflate the level at which these things are happening, because of seeing the opposite happen more often - unreasonable, disproportionate, possibly discriminatory scrutiny of a person and their disability being carried out by examination authorities when disability supports are requested. Therefore, as disability is very poorly understood not just in Indian society but in most, I would think we need extra evidence before we reach any conclusion.
2. Your point about "over and above your regular work" regarding the administrators' attitudes is a particularly good one. It does not seem like Jindal (or frankly any even reasonably well-known Indian university) has a specific, separate disability support department or office of disability support services with staff who have expertise in disability support in higher education, unlike universities in Britain and the U.S. Jindal law's DSC (for all the hype of "global university"/"global law school") seems to be employing the (very Indian) higher education industry standard of having ad-hoc arrangements to support disabled students. What you have said is the best argument for creating such offices. If that were to be done, we aren't having examination authorities doing stuff "over and above [their] regular work" for a number of reasons:
(a) The disability advisory and support service is responsible for investigating the level, presence or absence of a disability, medical condition or specific learning difference of students - making that a crucial part of their "regular work";
(b) Based on the expertise of their staff, the disability support office recommends examination access arrangements (from my experience of such things in Britain) to the examination authorities based on the actual need of the student balanced with fairness for everyone (they don't get it right 100% of the time, but usually do); and
(c) the bar for rejecting the disability support office's recommendation would have to be a high one - such as if that office had no backing based on evidence for its recommendation, or the recommendation for an access arrangement compromised its fairness or assessment of competency standards etc.
Just to add about my second point, this is not just me (a person who has experienced a different educational system) saying that universities in India need to have dedicated disability advisory and support offices. Anchel Bhateja, the first blind person to go to NLSIU, said this about her university in a newspaper article.
I'm not sure what your grievance is about, but I think you know exactly who you're targeting probably due to jealousy. Able-bodied persons can have their own struggles w.r.t. emotional trauma, remaining undiagnosed. Doesn't mean they do not get to avail DSC benefits here. If a competent authority is processing their registration, it's literally between them and the student. Your grievances harm your fellow batch mates.
Go talk to the DSC, figure out on what basis they allow relaxations. Maligning your own people is not okay.
Everything in the previous paragraph takes your post at face value - that you are actually telling the truth. I note this because there are things that seem very unusual about what you say - and I am coming from the point of view of a visibly disabled person who attended the type of flashy western university (whose disability support system is very good) that Jindal/JGLS would be trying to emulate to climb up the rankings:
1. First of all, in many circumstances, people with laptop kind of arrangements wouldn't have that in isolation. They would have it along with another arrangement, that is often called a "separate room". That's literally what it says on the tin - they'd be in a different room from the non-disabled students. Among other things, that helps invigilate them better.
2. You'd have to be the world's biggest prat to allow in internet-enabled laptops for in person examinations that didn't allow access to materials. Why! At my university, I couldn't even carry in my own laptop! (Even if I had turned the internet off.) I was given one of theirs to take my exams on. And, while my own laptop had an Indian keyboard, that was one hell of an inconvenience, because the placing of the @ symbol and quotation marks on a British keyboard compared to an Indian one are very different - an important point to note for lawyers taking exams.
Jindal as a university and JGLS as a law school may (does) have many faults, but you are making a very tall claim: that they are making elementary mistakes in walking a path that the type of universities they are aspiring to beat in the global competition do not make.
Moderators, please have this deeply provocative, problematic and irresponsible post removed, unless the author of it is able to provide proof in some form of what they are saying, or unless they give a written undertaking to you (privately is fine) that they will put their accusations before the appropriate authorities. Put a moderator note on the post to flag it as unverified material unless and until the one who wrote this helps resolve the issue one way or the other.
If you're looking at it purely from a job perspective, then the teams with the highest attrition usually have the most vacancies: Capital Markets, Funds, and Banking & Finance. (but there is a reason for high attrition that's the caveat)
If your goal is simply to join the largest practice groups, because more roles in the industry then look at General Corporate, M&A, and PE/VC, as they tend to have the biggest teams.
Also, moots aren't the be-all and end-all. You can always compensate with strong publications, ADR competitions, research work, and other achievements. That said, moots are one of the most valuable experiences in law school. A single moot can teach you more about a subject than an entire semester because it's the closest you'll get to actual legal practice as a student. So definitely give them a shot.
My internships are decent only, with 1 at LKS and Dhir&Dhir each, and a few under Supreme Court Judges and Advocates. I also participated in an international moot but wasn't able to qualify for the advanced rounds.
I have zero connections in this field, but still I'm trying to look for internships at tier-1 law firms. I really want to make a career abroad but I won't be able to devote huge money for LLM abroad, so I was still figuring out if there's any other route to join a global corporate firm.
Would be helpful if you could put forward your suggestions as to what I can possibly work upon in the next few months which I've left before applying for global forms? Or any other route you would suggest for building a legal career abroad.
My preferences were Disputes and Competition, but I was only sent an Assessment for Competition Law, which I cleared and received the internship confirmation. I am really looking to convert this into a Callback and then a PPO. However, a few seniors advised me that Competition is really niche and Disputes Hiring is also pretty low.
Can someone help me decide which team should I prefer among Disputes and Competition (if I get that opportunity with the HR, as I gave an assessment for Competition but my first preference was Disputes)? Also, I was referred for the Internship by a Disputes Team Person who came on campus for an event.
And how true is my senior's idea wrt hiring and that I should be interning with some other team?
Thank you for your help!
This is called pulling the ladder.
You have a bad boss.
I had one too.
Best to look elsewhere.
what do you think? good idea to embrace AI in legal education?
He/ she said it Rahul Gandhi of Noida
If the student won the essay competition, he/she should be smart enough to get a job at a better firm, hopefully. Good luck.
Only exception: international arbitration. That IS very portable and basically the same everywhere. But it is a very closed international clique. It's not a question of putting in applications to foreign arbitration firms - they will be thrown away without being read.
If you put in 2-3 years working for one of the top arbitration lawyers in India, learn about the field, build relationships with foreign lawyers etc, and basically do a lot of good networking, you have a chance.
For a PPO at Tri, the presentation plays a huge role. Good luck!