We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
So why the difference?
https://rankings.ft.com/rankings/3006/mba-2026
- IIMs are central universities
- Have alumni and top industry people on their governing bodies
- Don’t have dehaats as VCs and faculty
- Have a culture of prioritising meritocracy and academic elitism over welfarism and identitarianism
We had a good discussion with former Director of IIM Bangalore recently at NLS. He also pointed out how every Dean brought in their own ways to improvise the system. In law, unfortunately, there's a huge ceiling that stops it- BCI regulations. You can't put a practicing advocate as a teacher (except being Guest Faculty). You have to teach mnadatory courses as decided by the BCI. You have to have 60 hours per subject and so on.
Fake rankings hai yeh....