We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
https://x.com/vijeshetty/status/2059805101498532141
These students need to get over their NLUs.
Also, that video is quite old and not of heatwave underway presently.
Thank you for guiding me, Sir.
As if the top litigation counsels aren't outearning the top law firm partners by a factor of 3-5x atleast. Keep being in the delulu that a law firm 'job' is the key to growth and success
There is no salary in litigation
If you think there is
You have already lost the game
Second, not well connected? Look at the examples of so many successful 1st gen lawyers they all went on to become successful. You people have this negative mindset that nothing will happen in lit unless you are connected
You all have a mentality problem and will never ever succeed
My response to that from experience of British judges: very unlikely, but not entirely impossible. I know of some characters in the England and Wales judiciary who might do this kind of thing.
Similarly, the Canadian even South African judges didn't depend on a retinue of staff to get their water, tea, coffee etc and self service wasn't an odd thing to do. Can give many more examples but pointless.
Don't stop at cockroaches. Need more of insectkind.
An article from a free, non-paywalled source, covering the Lancaster affair comprehensively: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgqp74dvxqeo#main-heading
I have nothing against CJP. But I propose an alliance of butterflies (not the social variety) and bees. Gadflys strictly prohibited.