We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
They'll either think:
(i) you already have another offer and not take you seriously; or,
if you tell them you want a PPO from this firm because you "deserve better",
(ii) you are over-entitled and/or disloyal and not take you seriously.
It's better to just do the internship on merit without other baggage and accept the outcome.
However, if your existing PPO is from a better firm, it will be taken negatively.
Now, your idea can either backfire or work - if the place does not care about interns, you wouldn't have gotten a PPO anyways. But if it does, and you are someone who they see as someone who works hard, is intelligent, and would be a great addition to the team - they'd match the offer. Otherwise, they wouldn't care. I also hope these are litigation places/chambers and not some donkey work like mergers or corporate work in a law firm
The argument against: It makes you look like an arsehole to both sides.
The catch: Neither is necessarily totally wrong.