Jeez, pick up a history book on communism.

Most communist regimes in the world have always been very suppressive of individual rights and liberty. Stalin outlawed homosexuality in erstwhile USSR, which was not repealed until the regime came crashing down. The hero of modern day lefties, Che Guereva, along with his mentor Castro were known to be vocal homophobes and racists. Communist China continues to censor queer media (well, pretty much any media which they do not agree with). Civil rights for gay and trans people have been primarily spearheaded in Western free market capitalist countries by center left to center right political parties (circa 2001, the Netherlands), not by pro-authoritarianism commie whackjobs.

Personally, I strongly support trans rights, but I feel many activists shot their own feet by needlessly pushing on the sports issue-- something that is unfortunately, unjust.

So i gather several posts were made on this topic, and the mods saw fit to sit on it for two days and then choose the comment that invokes tribalism to start the thread. If anyone cares, here is the UK Communist party's statement as well: "We welcome the Supreme Court's clarification that "sex" means biological sex in the Equality Act 2010 in the case For Women Scotland Ltd (Appellant) v The Scottish Ministers (Respondent) 16 April 2025. The Supreme Court judgement was decided on the basis that the only coherent legal interpretation of the provisions defined in the Equality Act relating to sex discrimination was by reference to biological sex, upholding women's legal right to single-sex provision in employment, education facilites, sports, prisons, etc This materialist outcome corroborates our view that “sex” must mean biological sex for the purposes of the Act and any other interpretations would negate its single sex statutory protections. We reject any notion that the Supreme Court ruling was influenced by, or issued as a result of, a transphobic political climate and note Lord Hodge’s remark when delivering the judgement - that it should not be seen as victory of one side over another. We oppose misrepresentations of the ruling causing anxiety and division. Trans people continue to have protection against discrimination and harassment within the Equality Act and “In the light of case law interpreting the relevant provisions, a trans woman can claim sex discrimination because she is perceived to be a woman.” We reiterate that efforts must be made to improve resourcing within the current system for trans people to access the health and welfare services they need across Britain and that the Communist Party will continue to call for these. For Women Scotland, in winning their case against the Scottish government, have provided legal clarification for women and girls in the fight to assert and defend single sex provision in Britain, and we commend them."

https://x.com/CPBritain/status/1913240404641603908 Are the communist party of britain right wing? why do they then support the judgment and FWS? Gosh its almost like people across the political spectrum can agree that womens rights matter and that sex is real.

gender studies professors are not biologists. And there are no human rights that require the world to believe a blatant lie. There are only two sexes in mammals. This is not a situation where a compromise is acceptable. It's like if galileo said the earth revolved around the sun and the church said the sun revolved around the earth and you said- well the clergy seem to think that the sun revolves around the earth, at least they should compromise and decide the earth and the sun both revolve around the moon. That's silly.

Did you read the judgment? tell me which judge on the court is conservative? you dont know do you? conservative is just a word youre throwing out there thats not based in reality and thats meant to make people react in a tribal way. The judgment is not conservative. Its actually just really sharp work on interpretation of statutes and how to read the equality act.

JK Rowling has voted labour her entire life. sets up rape crisis centres for women, sends money to get women out of afghanistan, gives to gay rights charities. its really disingenuous to claim that shes some sort of right wing figure. What about Julie Bindel? is she right wing too? Kathleen Stock? Kara Dansky? Martina Navratilova? Germaine Greer? Nina Paley? You want to conflate all of these lefty women with Trump because you dont want to consider if you might be wrong. After all this is one of the few issues where theres broad agreement between the right and the left. And theres you- the fringe cult that refuses to see reality.

Are these humanities professors/ activists scientists or genetic experts? Or just some randos with some weird views pushing through their political agenda on a matter of science? There are inherent biological differences between males and females. XX chromosomes make a female, fake eyelashes and feelings don't. It is dangerous if you let biological males invade women's spaces. Women's rights activists should hail this judgement, not condemn it.

What are everyone’s thoughts on the UK Supreme Court decision saying trans women are not women?

From what I understand, they basically said there are only two sexes and this is determined at birth. You are born either male or female and you can’t transition into either. This goes against the current views held by gender studies professors and human rights activists. They could have at least have held that there is a third sex and mandated third gender toilets like in India. It seems to be a conservative decision by conservative judges, aligning with views of right-wing figures like Trump, JK Rowling etc.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/uk/trans-women-not-legally-women-under-equality-act-rules-uk-supreme-court/amp_articleshow/120361135.cms

The tide is turning! Donald Trump passed EOs saying much of the same. Now the UK Supreme Court sides with terfs and lesbians who say that certificates dont change your sex. Who will be courageous enough to speak up for womens rights in India?

Final judgment: https://supremecourt.uk/uploads/uksc_2024_0042_judgment_aea6c48cee.pdf

In a statement, Labour for Trans Rights said: “The Supreme Court’s decision is hugely disappointing, and a result of ceaseless lobbying from a well-funded anti-trans network with links to the global far-Right.

“We will continue to fight against all attempts to strip trans people of their rights, and will use all levers within the Labour Party to make trans voices heard.

Scottish Greens MSP Maggie Chapman has given her reaction to the ruling.

She says: “This is a deeply concerning ruling for human rights and a huge blow to some of the most marginalised people in our society.

“It could remove important protections and will leave many trans people and their loved ones deeply anxious and worried about how their lives will be affected and about what will come next.

“Trans people just want to be able to live their lives like any of us, without the fear of prejudice or violence, but today they have been badly let down."

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cvgq9ejql39t

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/04/16/supreme-court-rule-trans-women/