We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
- Tarunab Khaitan?
- Shamnad Basheer?
- Shyamkrishna Balganesh?
- Sudhir Krishnaswamy?
- Dev Gangjee?
- Lavanya Rajamani?
- Surabhi Ranganathan?
What exactly is wrong with you? Please do not put down a model of legal education which is among the best in the world, just to personally satisfy your own insecurities. This model has produced scholars of global repute, some of whom are household names in their respective fields. How many such did the pre-NLU, supposedly more rigorous, model of legal education produce? Okay, B.S. Chimne and Upendra Baxi. Great. Fill in at least five more names, I challenge you. Surely, if the pre-NLU model is that good, we can get seven names of legal scholars of global repute who were educated within it? After all, it had 40 more years of experience than the NLU model!
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-attraction-doctor/201303/avoiding-the-friend-zone-becoming-a-girlfriend-or-boyfriend?amp
In fact, you're living in the best possible time you could live in in history. Every bit of knowledge is at your fingertips; advances in medicine mean you're not dying of polio as a child, and even AIDS is basically just a condition you live with now. There are many cancers that are basically cured. You think bigotry and oppression and all your causes are bad now? How much worse would it have been had you been born 40 years ago? Here's a question-βwhen was the last time you were hungry? I mean, really hungry? Like, you need nutrition now hungry? Do you know how fortunate you are to not know that kind of hunger? I know young people have developing brains and little common senseβbut Jesusβgo touch some grass.
Nothing you've described is atypical of any other normal teenager. Your hormones are jumping all over the place and it leads to hightened emotions. Your generation just likes to pathologize everything and turn everything into an identity. You don't have mental health issues. You're having a bad day now and then. Deal with it and move on. Stop victimizing yourselves. No one is impressed by your many oppression points.
Did you know what it took to be 80 NLS grads in 2000? Do you know how hard you had to work and how lucky you had to be? Would you like to go back there? Would you rather NLS stop admitting more students and stick to 80? You cannot complain about everything-βif NLS admits more people, " oh not everyone is getting the best jobs" if nls doesnt admit more people " oh legal education is so elite" . No one owes you a job. Become someone worth hiring, someone who would contribute to the world around them, their employer, their firm, their family, their community, or whatever.
Were things this bad before? If not, what changed? Just social media and FOMO culture, or fewer job opportunities relative to the population? Just 80 NLSIU grads in 2000 versus over 3,000 NLU grads today?