Apt it would be to quote the chapter (The Archetypal Judge) from the magnum opus of George H. Gadbois. Following are the qualities typically found in the judges who made it at least to the SCI. Use it as the touchstone to quantify your chances.

"He was the son of a lawyer, often born into a family where the practice of law had been a tradition for generations. He was a Hindu and, more likely than not, a brahmin. He was born in an urban area into a wealthy or upper middle-class family. He received both his baccalaureate and law degrees in India. He was a high achiever, often the recipient of prestigious academic awards. He began his professional career at age twenty-four when he commenced the practice law before the high court of his home state. He may have been among the two dozen who was active in politics during these years. Twenty-two years later, after having reached the front rank of the bar of his high court, he was appointed to that court. A dozen years later, by which time he was very senior, usually its chief justice, he was appointed to the SCI. It was his seniority that raised him to the recruitment plateau, but to get to the SCI, he usually needed to be from a particular high court or geographic region. He was no younger than fifty-one and no older than sixty-two. He may have met the usual criteria of merit—integrity, professional competence, incorruptibility, and neutrality towards litigants—but was not selected for that reason. His religion, seniority, state and region of origin, among other considerations, were more weighty than merit as traditionally defined. He was 58.5 years of age when he arrived in Delhi and served for six and a half years until mandatory retirement forced his departure at age sixty-five. He remained active after leaving the bench. Serving on officially appointed commissions or tribunals and chamber practice were the most common post-retirement activities. He died when he was on the threshold of his eightieth year."

No. Like 95% not. Sorry the way we appoint Supreme Court judges in this country requires one to have great connections and a lot of luck and be exactly the right demographic at the right time. Most lower court judges also never see elevation to high courts. It would be a better tack to become a really really good litigator, get elevated to a high court and then try from there- but even if you became a really good litigator the rest will still take a lot of luck

Possible but improbable. One of the less-talked about consequences of the Collegium System in India is the complete destruction of federalism in the judicial branch. Judges of the Supreme Court look down upon their brothers and sisters in High Courts and who in turn look with nothing but scorn at their fellow judges in the district.