Read 22 comments as:
Filter By
The cost per student borne by most nlus is much higher than the fees that are charged from the students
Very fair solution. Yes to NRI applicants with higher marks than SC/ST/OBC kids, no to those with lower marks than them, because that would really be buying a seat and compromising merit.
People arguing against quota are Bolsheviks? You need to get your history checked.
There are many students who failed to crack CLAT and are still doing well in their legal career today. Is it your submission that they should all have been taken in too despite their CLAT failure?
Fully agree! In fact, 60% seats must be reserved for NRIs as well as DRIs (Domestic Rich Individuals) and then you can see the change in profile of these sarkari institutions
A 35-word comment posted 1 year ago was not published.
Why is this marked trollish? It's plain facts. The moderator seems to be the biased one here.
A 7-word comment posted 1 year ago was not published.
The CJI is the Chancellor of one of the NLUs having such quota. Nothing is going to happen to the NLUs anytime soon for this.
A 4-word comment posted 1 year ago was not published.
A 90-word comment posted 1 year ago was not published.
A 30-word comment posted 1 year ago was not published.
The loss of revenue (given the much higher fees such students pay) will mean that NLUs will increase their intake and hike fees for the rest of the students to offset this loss.