We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Time to go back to its ‘boutique’ roots LOL
Hope some sense prevails and they can correct course.
So leaders in applying/ enforcing a thought. I’m sure you can now figure out the Hindi translation for this.
Secondly CSS will quickly realise that they have too many people already under YA and ML has taken his whole team with so many freshers and A1/ A2s, something not required in the least at CAM. There could be firing? but that is usual in ECM. Not able to keep up margins, the recently promoted partners may be asked to leave slowly, till momentum is reached. ECM was never an efficient practice anyway though, but having ML is different. Coupled with a high profit per partner firm like CAM, this is a win for CSS. But surely CSS will have to concede equity to ML and other probably, will have to assess dynamics.
Undoubtedly now, this leaves CAM to be a Tier 1 (unfortunately) practice in ECM, they were already doing very well in PF, B&F and GC with heavyweights like LV and the others. ML will now truly be a tier 1 firm heavyweight, and not just a star practice in a tier 2 firm. Firms like S&R have died down in ECM , doing just a few mandates, deteriorating numbers considerably, this can be due to their extremely bureaucratic structure and hard to gel with people. CAM already has billion dollar IPO mandates for next year for Uber Level companies, ML addition will only add several more. CAM can now negotiate better costs with clients, have more bargaining power in the listed market. Possibly internally, atleast the ECM practice would be one with good culture considering ML will run a tight knit team as he ran at Indus, and micromanage affairs. CAM would undoubtedly attract more talent now considering the good culture and already decent tier 1 pay. I just hope CSS doesnt crush this down as he likes to do.
Partners easily bill 15-20 crore pa.
This comment is pretty telling - we'll see how places with huge resources and longer relationship cope. No smoke without fire.
Unrelated question, was ML a Luthra homegrown?
https://india.legalbusinessonline.com/appointments/induslaw-continues-see-exits-real-estate-team-jumps-sr
https://india.legalbusinessonline.com/appointments/induslaw-continues-see-exits-real-estate-team-jumps-sr
Yash Ashar doesn't stand a chance in front of Manan Lahoty. I don't think Manan will agree to be a Co head of any ECM team.
2. How different is the pay structure? How much would have Manan Lahoty made by this jump?
3. How will CAM benefit from this deal as ECM is a low margin practice area?
He definitely got the say in management (pretty much everything that he wanted and wanted Indus to do was done I hear). But, the "build" part was not happening since the Practice was slanted towards the underwriters based on the deal reporting. Clearly, going back to a big Brand, cuts out the hassle of the "hustle" and things will come much easier. Does that make this an execution role more than a "builder" role? Only time will tell- with the markets being on the roll that they are (and seem to be), the Cap Markets teams are losing their "cyclical" stigma. Cyril also does to kill competition by taking out a competitor in a pretty much monopolistic game. Win-Win immediate term. But, then lateral integration is a huge problem across all firms, leave alone Big Law. and bigger the team, bigger the problem.
Building a Tier 1 practice (this is not about quality, but about a niche practice area)+ jacking up the profile of a Tier 2 Firm, while coming from a Tier 1 Firm is hard. Tier 1 spoils you and kills your hunger for a hustle in niche practices after you have established yourself. The Brand itself draws a lot of the work. And yeah, I do know about this having been there and done that.
So, eventually that's what it is, isn't it? Giving up on "building" and ruling the roost to boost profile/make more money. Who are we to judge? But, sure as hell, we can comment and have opinion, no?
Well paid ‘lawyers’ though :)
The question now is: who will hire people wishing to work at Indus' Capital Markets?
Anjali Menon, Mansi Jhaveri, and Neha Balodhi are the three Principal Associates listed on their website. Have these PAs also departed with the large group, or are they staying with Indus to potentially become partners?
Please share any information you may have about this. It is important for me to know as soon as possible.
Senior - Ravi, Abhiroop, Vishal
Mid Senior - Manshoor, Abhyuday
Junior - Anshul, Priyadarshini, Puneet
Don't know where you're getting your facts from but rest assured that undercutting is not how we sustain ourselves with less work when our associates say enough. And for chrissake let's not bundle us with the rest of the lot.
Idk what the definition of T1 is these days because the said T2 practice managing to match your money, your filing numbers and for chrissake being poles apart from your culture is a win anyday.
No smoke without fire.