Let's talk about this supposed grade inflation in favour of the 3yr program. How is it coming about? I can think of three scenarios:

1. The individual initiative: Each faculty member is individually deciding to inflate grades. Why would they do that? The same faculty teach both programs and that includes faculty who were here before Sudhir joined, those who came after, those who are alum of the 5 Yr program and those who are not. Why would they individually converge on the same policy that does not benefit them in any way?

2. The grand conspiracy: this is all orchestrated from the top, possibly by Sudhir himself, and all the faculty are not only in on the conspiracy, but also on keeping it secret. Again, why would such a disparate bunch of people, many of whom don't like Sudhir and otherwise openly criticise him, comply?

3. The nothingburger: There is no grade inflation. It's a claim that has never been proved, just asserted. Just as butt hurt men claim that any woman who succeeds does so by sleeping her way to the top, so also some butthurt 5yrs are creating this narrative to put down people that they think are less deserving than them.

Which scenario is most likely?

I don't know if faculty are grade inflating. I do know that they are failing to teach basic logic and humanity to their students. Maybe we should be talking about that instead.

If we're gonna talk about grades not reflecting performance, how about using year-old grades through misrepresentation and slacking off in your penultimate year to get all these PPOs and offers that you have? Not one of these are based on the latest set of grades and you lie and say it's the most up to date information. Y'all are a bunch of clowns. Update your rank list first and then talk big but you are just a bunch of frauds getting by on the coattails of your institution. Hope some HR catches on to your BS.

How do you know 'several law firms refused' applications? Just trying to create a narrative which you guys anyway peddle from day 1 of this program's genesis. About to wrap up my degree in NLS, and I have not seen any indications of the admin favouring our batch. Promotional activities and outreach activities are a different thing. Nothing is an open secret, it is just rumour mill that is churning out false narratives on the creditworthiness of this program. None of the folks in the LLB program have ever engaged in the US vs. Them debate. The person in LLB who participated alone due to other team members not being able to participate on account of visa issues did acknowledge that in his post. Nobody is negating their hard work. The other poster's response was in relation to you casting doubt on people's ability to perform well; point being that the 3 year LLB guy was able to perform even without BA LLB co participants being on board. Had they been there, you would have likely given all the credit to the BA LLB participants. It's you who is negating the effort of other people just because they happen to be from a different program.

You are very quick to point the supposed unfair advantages that we are accorded with, but would very conveniently leave out the assistance y'all get from certain key POCs in firms.

Nothing we do is ever enough for you or your ilk to prove that students in the 3 year LLB are equally passionate and hardworking. Earlier the narrative was ohh they didn't perform well in moots, now that we are making a foray in that domain, the narrative has shifted to ohh the top 24 ranks are from BA LLB. Given your numbers isn't that inevitable? We're just a two-three year old program, and within that duration we have improved our performance in moots. The guy who topped univs is one example, but even if you remove that as one odd case, there are people who have secured good ranks. Maybe not in top 25, but surely in top 45. The combined strength of LLB cohorts is somewhere around 100-120 students. This including both the batches. That is the batch strength of one entire section in BA LLB. Given your numbers, it's likely that you would have more participants.

"We all know how grade inflation is systemic in LLB"? A baseless allegation. You have absolutely no basis to say that grades are inflated.

I am happy that students from the BA LLB program got a good number of PPOs. I really am, because unlike petty low lives like you I don't revel in bringing other people down to get ahead in life. And trust me, none of the LLBs engage in the mudslinging contest that some of you in the BA LLB seem to enjoy. That is what makes us different. I wish you love and light and perhaps some sense too.

Byee.

Stats - https://www.barandbench.com/apprentice-lawyer/rectracker-35-students-from-nlsiu-batch-of-2025-bag-ppos-before-day-zero

1. CAM's 2 internship policy isn't set in stone. I know of at least 3 NLS BA LLB students in the past who have done the same. If you have to brag, at least don't be ignorant. CAM gives PPOs in the first internship itself if the rank is sufficiently high and we all know how grade-inflation is systematic among LLBs.

2. The rest of the team for the moot court competition couldn't make it due to visa issues. To just erase their efforts over months reeks of insecurity. Same goes for the negotiation competition which could not have done as well without the ace negotiator from the ba llb cohort.

3. 1 LLB got the highest marks in oral rounds, sure. But lets also talk about how 24/25 top ranks went to BA LLB students.

As for law firms "considering their applications", it is an open secret that several law firms openly refused to consider you all and that it happened only after much begging and personal lobbying from certain bigwigs in the admin department. Stop attributing it to your efforts when it is solely because of daddy's lobbying.

1. If you were in the know or a viable candidate for any of these firms yourself, you'll know there have been multiple single internship PPOs from CAM this year on the basis of performance. Not everyone has to use your methods lmao.

2, 3 and 4) The fact is the LLB program is doing well bro. Your entire batches of hundreds aren't filled with Einsteins either. For a program that didn't even exist when y'all were probably hustling to make your copycat CVs from first year, they're doing just fine is the point.

1. CAM offering PPO after 1 internship rather than 2 points towards a Daddy's PPO.

2. Yeah the LLB student that reached that reached the semi-finals of ICC did great but how does that matter for placement? One person's achievement can't define a batch, can it?

3. The team that won the international nego competition had people from both the LLB and the BALLB.

4. Yeah the highest score in the oral round went to an LLB guy but the top 24/25 ranks went to BALLBs. Do give a batch (sorry programme) team to the guy that scored the highest

Cope - https://www.linkedin.com/posts/recruitment-coordination-committee-nlsiu-batch-of-2025_nlsiu-ba-llb-ppo-records-activity-7223306585299697664-MSje?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop

All the major law firms have accepted their applications for Day 0, for the most part. There's no lack of willingness to consider people. Whether they get selected or not is a matter of individual competence. If you get good grades and do cool things, you'll get. Else, you won't.

The CAM PPO was after a single internship, despite the firm having a 2 internship policy. An LLB student single-handedly reached the semifinals of an international moot after the rest of the team couldn't make it. An LLB team won an international negotiation competition recently. The person with the highest marks in the Moot Oral Rounds this year is, you guessed it, an LLB student in the year with the most number of participants literally ever.

How much longer are few of you going to peddle your tired narratives about the world not taking their program seriously? Or that the student quality is remotely lacking in any way?

Some of you have a Sudhir hate-boner and want to take it out on everything even tangentially related to him. Well, jokes on you. Not because of him at all but because of the students, this program is going to succeed. Go cry about it

People who do 3yr LLB are grass puller ? And what are u doing then ? Starting your own firm ?

Learn to be respectful..there are lot of people who did 3yr llb and are doing great in the profession be it corporate job or practice...

People like u only know how to mock others