We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
27 more will be sitting for Day zero.
The CAM PPO was after a single internship, despite the firm having a 2 internship policy. An LLB student single-handedly reached the semifinals of an international moot after the rest of the team couldn't make it. An LLB team won an international negotiation competition recently. The person with the highest marks in the Moot Oral Rounds this year is, you guessed it, an LLB student in the year with the most number of participants literally ever.
How much longer are few of you going to peddle your tired narratives about the world not taking their program seriously? Or that the student quality is remotely lacking in any way?
Some of you have a Sudhir hate-boner and want to take it out on everything even tangentially related to him. Well, jokes on you. Not because of him at all but because of the students, this program is going to succeed. Go cry about it
2. Yeah the LLB student that reached that reached the semi-finals of ICC did great but how does that matter for placement? One person's achievement can't define a batch, can it?
3. The team that won the international nego competition had people from both the LLB and the BALLB.
4. Yeah the highest score in the oral round went to an LLB guy but the top 24/25 ranks went to BALLBs. Do give a batch (sorry programme) team to the guy that scored the highest
2, 3 and 4) The fact is the LLB program is doing well bro. Your entire batches of hundreds aren't filled with Einsteins either. For a program that didn't even exist when y'all were probably hustling to make your copycat CVs from first year, they're doing just fine is the point.
2. The rest of the team for the moot court competition couldn't make it due to visa issues. To just erase their efforts over months reeks of insecurity. Same goes for the negotiation competition which could not have done as well without the ace negotiator from the ba llb cohort.
3. 1 LLB got the highest marks in oral rounds, sure. But lets also talk about how 24/25 top ranks went to BA LLB students.
As for law firms "considering their applications", it is an open secret that several law firms openly refused to consider you all and that it happened only after much begging and personal lobbying from certain bigwigs in the admin department. Stop attributing it to your efforts when it is solely because of daddy's lobbying.
You are very quick to point the supposed unfair advantages that we are accorded with, but would very conveniently leave out the assistance y'all get from certain key POCs in firms.
Nothing we do is ever enough for you or your ilk to prove that students in the 3 year LLB are equally passionate and hardworking. Earlier the narrative was ohh they didn't perform well in moots, now that we are making a foray in that domain, the narrative has shifted to ohh the top 24 ranks are from BA LLB. Given your numbers isn't that inevitable? We're just a two-three year old program, and within that duration we have improved our performance in moots. The guy who topped univs is one example, but even if you remove that as one odd case, there are people who have secured good ranks. Maybe not in top 25, but surely in top 45. The combined strength of LLB cohorts is somewhere around 100-120 students. This including both the batches. That is the batch strength of one entire section in BA LLB. Given your numbers, it's likely that you would have more participants.
"We all know how grade inflation is systemic in LLB"? A baseless allegation. You have absolutely no basis to say that grades are inflated.
I am happy that students from the BA LLB program got a good number of PPOs. I really am, because unlike petty low lives like you I don't revel in bringing other people down to get ahead in life. And trust me, none of the LLBs engage in the mudslinging contest that some of you in the BA LLB seem to enjoy. That is what makes us different. I wish you love and light and perhaps some sense too.
Byee.
1. The individual initiative: Each faculty member is individually deciding to inflate grades. Why would they do that? The same faculty teach both programs and that includes faculty who were here before Sudhir joined, those who came after, those who are alum of the 5 Yr program and those who are not. Why would they individually converge on the same policy that does not benefit them in any way?
2. The grand conspiracy: this is all orchestrated from the top, possibly by Sudhir himself, and all the faculty are not only in on the conspiracy, but also on keeping it secret. Again, why would such a disparate bunch of people, many of whom don't like Sudhir and otherwise openly criticise him, comply?
3. The nothingburger: There is no grade inflation. It's a claim that has never been proved, just asserted. Just as butt hurt men claim that any woman who succeeds does so by sleeping her way to the top, so also some butthurt 5yrs are creating this narrative to put down people that they think are less deserving than them.
Which scenario is most likely?
I don't know if faculty are grade inflating. I do know that they are failing to teach basic logic and humanity to their students. Maybe we should be talking about that instead.
Oh, no, hate that you had to hear it from LI, sorry to know that your RCC is hiding things from you ://
"You are very quick to point the supposed unfair advantages that we are accorded with, but would very conveniently leave out the assistance y'all get from certain key POCs in firms."
Lmao bhai, its called building a rapport with the firm, which we are good at. That is not an "unfair advantage". Do better than word salads.
Learn to be respectful..there are lot of people who did 3yr llb and are doing great in the profession be it corporate job or practice...
People like u only know how to mock others