Read 23 comments as:
Filter By
He meant awful. Why should citizenship be selectively given based on religion is the first question. The second is that they did a very shoddy job with the rules, leaving tons of ambiguity in it, which is now hindering even their own populist purposes before the election.
It's not about "why they should" but "whether they can." And, if they can then morality has no place here.
Morality always has a place. Those who deem that it doesn't will always be separated and remembered by history.
That's is not for the courts to decide. If it's legally correct then anyone's moral stance is of no relevance.
"Morality always has a place. Those who deem that it doesn't will always be separated and remembered by history."- My new favorite line.
all those downvotes just show the intellectual capacity of those liberals who oppose CAA and ask for alleged minorities to be added
Best thing Government did was to bring CAA, All Self intellectual can cry in NLUs. All non-Muslims who are persecuted by Islamic countries like Bangladesh and Pakistan should be welcomed as a step of Inclusive country like self intellectual always claim.
What's to stop them from using the existing older citizenship rules? If Muslims from other countries can use those same rules to get citizenship, then why not people from other religion?
Can someone explain why NLUs are so silent about CAA??? 4 years ago NLUs protested in the streets and one NLU banned the present Vice President of India (then a Governor) from campus. Why the silence now??
Tier 1 NLU here, most people are apolitical. Especially lockdown batches.
Because you're an authority on both the identities?
A 8-word comment posted 2 years ago was not published.
A 21-word comment posted 2 years ago was not published.