Read 49 comments as:
Filter By
A 11-word comment posted 2 years ago was not published.
There are few judges who have still not taken the interview of the candidates.
Same

I am waiting for there response. They are delaying everything .
Kindly update if anyone has any idea about the results.
Still there are few candidates whose interview is not yet conducted.
SAME CASE. MINE WAS LAST MONTH. EVEN THEY DONT RESPOND WITH EXACT DATE.
Has anyone here heard back from the registry? My interview happened more than 15 days ago, still no news
A 14-word comment posted 2 years ago was not published.
Whats the status of result post the interviews.

Any updates so far??
What is the process for interview? Usually how long does the process take after filling up of preferences
Lol, the exam process has NEVER been transparent. Just pray they follow the timelines.
Guys is the process expected to be transparent after last year???
Honestly, no one gives a shit about college in courts. It's your contacts or privilege.
Yes question 3 pf part 2 seemed to be very specific towards judgements rather than requiring a descriptive based answer like the sample
If you are getting 70 in this paper, that seems to be better than enough. I am sure Part 2 would have been good too. But then, their process would still remain transparent even if you get through
Anyone feel Part 2 questions being much different than Sample Ques (of this year and last) and even diff than the last year ques paper?

Specially Ques 2. And the new question 3 was much more specific and, might I say, less analytical.
How's the scores after the revised answer key?? They have given out a lot of marks xD
A 26-word comment posted 2 years ago was not published.
A 7-word comment posted 2 years ago was not published.
A 1-word comment posted 2 years ago was not published.
it was super tough and lengthy. im scoring about 30. very disappointed. part 2 was easier but part 1 was just traumatic
What's the point of this exam? We can still get a clerkship based on contacts if we're from top NLUs right?
Because SC is more likely to deal with constitutional issues.
Same here. Not even crossing 40 in paper 1 (attributable to non-preparation). It appeared to be lengthy. Also the duration was 2.5 hours, 30 minutes less than last year. But overall the questions were of solid standard.
Wow and I got in by just applying in the late 00s.
It was difficult. Last year it was easy to score 80/100. This time 50/100 is also difficult. All because of ambiguous options and based on latest judgements
I'm getting like 70 but have a feeling part II was not that great. Is this enough?