If you are getting 70 in this paper, that seems to be better than enough. I am sure Part 2 would have been good too. But then, their process would still remain transparent even if you get through
Same here. Not even crossing 40 in paper 1 (attributable to non-preparation). It appeared to be lengthy. Also the duration was 2.5 hours, 30 minutes less than last year. But overall the questions were of solid standard.
It was difficult. Last year it was easy to score 80/100. This time 50/100 is also difficult. All because of ambiguous options and based on latest judgements
Why was there so much constitution? Question 3 only had landmark judgements like jalikattu etc which nobody reads unless they are preparing for judiciary. Is this all what law is about?
Constitution and shit. Barely any questions from commercial laws like IBC etc.
Constitution and shit. Barely any questions from commercial laws like IBC etc.
Pathetic
Specially Ques 2. And the new question 3 was much more specific and, might I say, less analytical.