We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
To be quite honest, it was a calculated guess from my side. I would elaborate on how I made the following guess so that it doesn't make anyone paranoid about their IP being disclosed.
1. The comment just above him, which ACTUALLY answered the query got no traction, while the comment that was solely intended to target and disregard the question at hand got such a positive response, which seemed off to me.
2. While the first point may have been speculation, the upcoming point convinced me.
As Mods, we're enabled to see a series of 3 randomized emojis that denote a certain IP that is not disclosed to anyone, and even those randomized emojis get refreshed every 24-48 hours. The comment had a reply under it that said "Lol yeah." supposing itself as a concurring opinion with the guy who wrote the original comment, but in reality it was the same person, which had the same 3 randomized series of emojis denoting the same encrypted IP. This ultimately translates to him seeking validation for his comment. Hence, I made the following assertion.
I had to answer in full depth so as not to leave the wrong impression since the IP revelation is rightfully a sensitive topic. If you have any further questions, feel free to ask ;)
The whole process is better explained here: https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/295300-is-legally-india-truly-anonymous#comment-295578
Maine to comment bhi nahi Kiya 💀
2. As a member and fellow moderator of the platform, I do not feel SUPERIOR to anyone, be it someone from 'tier-3 NLU or lower', so I don't understand the point made. I've always upheld the stance that acing CLAT doesn't translate into one being a better lawyer.
3. Rather than targeting, you should've instead presented your points on why SLSP is a better choice. Given the circumstances and the financial aspect, it makes no sense to burn an extra 4 lakhs for arguably the same experience when he/she might take CLAT next year.
4. You shouldn't be so petty as to inflate your upvotes by refreshing the page. Grow up :)
I personally did not like the environment here and thus appeared for clat this year and will, in all probability, shift to a better college. The placements and internships are not very encouraging either (they are still perhaps the best amongst t2 NLUs but not great nonetheless).
Point being, choose HNLU for now. If you like your life here, stick with it. If not, retake clat and go for a better NLU if you get one. Even in case of the latter, you'd still only end up spending half of what you would at symbiosis.
All the best!