Easy. He does not give away undeserved marks, and requires students to make real effort. Nor will he grant random and unlimited extensions or fake attendance. All those are things that Noojies have become accustomed to, so they can't digest quality.
Try asking your immediate seniors. They might be in a better position to help you out. However, if it was me, I would have taken up Patent Law and Investment.
I didn't like the way she taught IP. Made everything too philosophy based. Unlike any other teacher, she is the only one who purposely withheld internal marks before exam.
Go for World Trade by Dr Sandeepa Bhat and Patent Law by Dr Anirban Mazumdar without a doubt. Only professors who'll teach well and are par excellence in the subjects
No classes, nothing to learn. Outdated syllabus. For example, competition faculty won't teach you about combinations because the syllabus hasn't been updated ever since the combination regulations had been notified in 2011.
These Noojies are treating LI as their notice board. Dude you and your faculty are both pathetic, so it doesn't matter which papers you choose. Nobody cares either.
My elective options: public health law, patent law, competition law, world trade law, forensic science, law and public servants, women's rights, agriculture law, investment law and nanotech law. Can choose two but making a list of top four. Can someone help me out. I'm interested in corp so picking corp aligned subjects
investment