Mentioning all THe recruiters can be done by anyone and even assistant professors. You seem like a person graduated way back in 2010 or a just a recent frustrated associate who feels his or her nujs tag is worthless (which may be true). And look into this year’s NIRF. The placement metrics are all over the place. Just go and lead your mediocre life man.

By what fashion? NUJS mentions all the recruiters and the exact number of students whom they have recruited in the final placement report for every batch. How else do you think a placement report is prepared? The market is aware of the fact how each recruiter pays, so there is no requirement to make random claims about median salary. You seem to be as ignorant about placement matters as you're about NIRF. Just go and study, man.

Cute, deliberately skipping the word report from your quotes. You need to do better even as a law student. The meanings are different. And no, no university does give its placement report to NIRF, nor does the latter ask for it. You should ask the people in your university who actually work on NIRF data, because clearly you're ignorant about the process. As for your continued fake bluster about inflated reports, our reports are released in the public domain, kid. Why don't you identify a false claim in it? Or does your baseless opinion count as audit these days? We are confident about the veracity of the report that we release, that's why we do release it in the public and don't hide it or fake it, unlike you. As for our placement cell, it gives us all the jobs that we want. Clearly, you won't get one based on your empty bluster without a shred of facts. That's why it's all sour grapes with you.

You are the one who are broken, because you see the whole world from your toxic and jaundiced perspective. The hatred that you display for another institution with which you have got no association whatsoever is clearly indicative of you having psychological problems that requires therapeutic assistance. Everything about your latest comment spells out the disturbance in your mind. You lack logic, sense and the mental maturity to engage in any real conversation. You are the one who is deciding who is smart, over-smart and despicable, so it is clear that you are the one with a judgmental bent of mind, not someone else. If you are actually from NLS, which hardly seems likely, then that institute actually has got more problems than it probably even realises. Please keep up the toxic and abusive trolling.

“I retain sufficient sense not to let every discussion descend to this juvenile game of law school faux-rivalry.” - yet you still barge into the comments with your despicable logic and pretend to be a know-it-all toxic noojie when in reality you have no clue about smartness.

I am not denying that Nujs in the last ten years got 4 Rhodes scholars but even after taking that into account - who are you to claim that ten years are a good metric? R u the chairperson of the Mensa society? Thought so.

And stop subtly commenting against an institute (which is way outside your IQ) and then pretending as if that was supporting the very institute. Your kind of degrading trolling has been here since ages. Don’t pretend to be over smart when you lack basic smartness. Read your comment again. Fix your logic and then come talk here

NLS is going down the drain thanks to Messiah's decisions, so this might be their last few shots to get another scholarship. But NUJS is also equally in trouble thanks to the higher intake for lower CLAT ranks in the BScLLB course+domicile quota. But the funny thing in all this is that all the CLAT NLUs (NLS, Nalsar and NUJS) are on the same sinking ship so there still won't be much of a change in hierarchies.

This is what happens when NLSIU accepts so many students that the quality gets diluted. You can't even read and understand statements contextually. When you write, "Stop using this decade logic", or "arey what is this comment", it is clear that you're having problem accepting it. That's what digesting means. It's not my fault that you prefer to write like a school-going adolescent still. As for your clueless reading of that comment you referred to, it is obvious that you still couldn't comprehend its meaning. It was actually in favour of NLSIU and said that people shouldn't consider NLS' success only as old success, but the recent students have been doing equally well. However, you trolls saw the name NUJS and automatically got triggered and thereafter lost all sense. Talk about 15 years or 20, who is stopping you? It is a factual matter that in the last 10 years NUJS got 4 such scholars and NLSIU got 3. If your brain perceives it as a comparison between law schools and their academic quality, then you need professional help and are actually the victim of the insecurity complex that you flippantly accuse others of. Finally, if you are indeed from NLS, then you have made it clear to every reader through your comments that you are yet to be able to make use of the quality of its academic lessons. I am not from either place, but even had I been thus, I retain sufficient sense not to let every discussion descend to this juvenile game of law school faux-rivalry. Only losers who won't amount to anything indulge in such.

What’s with the harsh words like ‘digesting’. If you have issues accepting that nlsiu is better than Nujs then don’t comment. And no by your logic even a 15 year period seems like a good way to gauge the institutional success of Rhodes considering how every year nlu doesn’t have law students achieving their Rhodes dream. Take 2022 for an example.

The kind of insecurity your comment projects only makes me lose faith on your basic logic sense.

You don’t even seem an alumni from NLS (Law school) yo. Aagye troll karne? First start speaking true facts about yourself in spite of being an anonymous troll hampering discussion. And if you have so much problem with nlsiu , maybe reflect on your clat performance years back as to why you didn’t crack it :)

Only trolls would consider a factual statement as jealousy. As for your own comment, only immature people like you believe that law schools are at war with each other and hence would have to defeat anyone else. Clearly shows the current standard of whichever institution you belong to. In case it's Law School, I feel ashamed, being an alum myself.

A decade is a universally accepted parameter while gauging any current or recent performance. If you can't digest that, then that's your problem. One can't understand why, since the commentator actually said good things about NLSIU's current performance, but that's probably way too subtle for your comprehension. Using your logic, DU has a better academic reputation than NLSIU.