We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Source: nls student
After qualifying for the entry, everyone should ideally be given the same amount of respect, regardless of their petty CLAT ranks.
We were called for the final interviews (yes, we had those) according to our ranks in the entrance exam. Once that was done, we were sent to the hostel (MHOR and WHOR, IYKYK) to get our rooms allocated.
In other words, once upon a time, first year hostel rooms were allocated according to your rank in the qualifying exam. From the second year onwards, you could pick your roommates.
In my year, it wasn't alphabetical either - in fact I have no idea how they organized it
- individual excellence and merit (first preference in room selection those who top entrance exams, also reduce their hostel fees by 50% as a reward)
-individual economic choice (have the option where one can pay more for a single room else live in a shared room or dorm for less)
- individual social choice (allow people to choose who to share a room with and who not to share a room with: if I am an English-speaking metro city kid who likes Metallica, reads Ayn Rand, supports Modi and hates wokeism, and I want to share a room with another person who ticks those boxes, then allow me that choice and please spare me your lectures about caste and privilege)