This question is useless. No amount of training can help someone who revels in being disrespectful. All you can do is confront them, ridicule them, or if your means allow, sue the university in whatever capacity until they have to take action against the prof to limit their own liability.

Sensitivity training assumes that the recipient is open to change, and unfortunately that is just not the case unless a negative personal cost is created. You can’t expect niceness. You just have to be the more belligerent party, until it makes sense for them to cut the crap.

It doesn’t have to be done alone, for instance I remember hearing of an instance where a prof passed a remark on a girl who wore shorts to class and thr next day the whole batch wore shorts to class.

Most of the students currently graduating from law school still know very little of law, and while the responsibility for that colossal omission rests partly with the teachers, a considerable part of it does also rest with the students themselves. Getting a degree with good grades regardless of actual perfomance or efforts, and then a well-known paid job regardless of capability to actually do the job well, these are the only reasons why 90% get enrolled into universities to begin with.

teen india is very political. we were more innocent. yes new age people are cautious of when they say and when. they are slyer. it is a good skill to be platform aware. no angels are flying off those little shorts.
This argument like many tiny shorts has holes and patches.
But yes sensitisation training is about what to SAY not think and in this the older ones need training. Mooh band rakhen dimaag nahin.

Here is a GenZ kid talking about being broad minded and being receptive of issues faced by certain individuals and marginalised classes, while being typically what it is opposing, accepting view point of others.

My friend, you're exactly what you hate. You just have a different voice but the same principal.

Boomers aren't hopeless, you are. And 50 year olds may retire soon, but the mentality of ignoring low life's like you isn't retiring.

And this why we're going down the gutters because you're infesting more corridors on a daily basis.

Bhai dekh, I was born in the 80s and I am all of the above - anti-racist, anti-sexist, anti-homophobic, anti-xenophobic, anti–religious bigotry, etc. Never let anyone/ any survey fool you into believing that because someone was born somewhere/ at a certain time, then he/ she is a certain way. We come in all shapes and sizes. Ab tum sare 80s / 90s born logo se interact to karoge nai, right? So judge them as and when you meet them. Advance judgement avoid karo.

Mere papa bola karte the - beta, [...] nai hota, 1-2 idhar udhar milte rehte hai. Similarly, you will find racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, etc. people anywhere and of all ages.

Also, which ever prof. hurt you, if he/ she is an a-hole, then he/ she is an a-hole. But that should not trigger you into passing judgement on me. Understood?

Get out of your bubble. Young people today are not any of those things. A teen vogue article does not represent India. Indian Youth are turning highly conservative. This is a natural consequence of a lack of jobs, growth or prospects. No one has been able to deliver the India they want to them. So they cling to their prejudices and religion.

You sound like someone who has literally never left the Colaba Woke Circus. Get out in the real world. Talk to people your age who are already working two or three jobs. Ask them what they think of liberalism.

Liberalism died in India cause India's liberals failed to deliver.

“This is totally true for India as well. Thus, you have a situation where students cite problems such as discrimination, poverty and mental health, but teachers look the other way and think these problems are not "serious enough" and students are making "excuses". They use flawed quantitative metrics like grades and attendance to diminish qualitative factors and lived experiences. Another problem is in classroom teaching. A lot of very problematic language is being used by certain professors. this is further polluting the atmosphere”

If you are discriminated against or face poverty, if you get into a decent law school you can break the shackles of poverty.
Going to a law school is about getting theoretical knowledge and practical training. Which way do you think your boss is going to look, when your excuses for inefficiency are discrimination, poverty or mental health issues?
With regards to problematic language, consider it a part of practical training because sooner or later this could be an integral part of your ‘lived experiences’.

This constant need for the world to change and be more sensitive needs to stop for your own sake!
Don’t expect your professors, colleagues, your seniors to mollycoddle you or your sensitivities because the harsh truth is they are there to do their job and earn a living and they cannot care less about anything other than that.
The sooner you stop looking for a moral guide or an ideal person, the better!

They need training, period (not the kind of woke crap training referred to in the question).

Most "professors" in law schools are hopelessly lacking in even the core knowledge of their disciplines and couldn't perform half as well in the real world practicing, as the students that they purport to teach.

"This is a generation which is profoundly anti-racist, anti-sexist, anti-homophobic, anti-xenophobic, and anti–religious bigotry."

You do realize that this is very much what the Hippies (today aka Boomers) felt about themselves? They were going to be a 'free' world - free of exactly these things.

The way I see it, a cultural generation gap that is the root cause of many of the problems we are seeing in law schools. Gen X/Gen Y professors are children of the 1980s and 1990s. In these decades the culture was heavily patriarchal, heteronormative and ableist. As for Boomers (1960s and 1970s children), let's not even go there.

In contrast, Gen Z/Gen Alpha students have grown up in the 2000s and 2010s, where there is a greater stress towards equality and more sensitivity towards minorities, marginalised groups, those with mental health issues etc. To quote Bernie Sanders:

What I will say is — and I say this sincerely — is that I think the younger generation today is probably the most progressive young generation in the history of this country. This is a generation which is profoundly anti-racist, anti-sexist, anti-homophobic, anti-xenophobic, and anti–religious bigotry. It is a generation of tolerance and decency. And that is no small thing. And that generation should be very proud of who they are.

https://www.teenvogue.com/story/bernie-sander-gen-z-generation-tolerance-decency-aoc-2020-revolution-interview

This is totally true for India as well. Thus, you have a situation where students cite problems such as discrimination, poverty and mental health, but teachers look the other way and think these problems are not "serious enough" and students are making "excuses". They use flawed quantitative metrics like grades and attendance to diminish qualitative factors and lived experiences. Another problem is in classroom teaching. A lot of very problematic language is being used by certain professors. this is further polluting the atmosphere.

Boomers are hopeless and anyaway retiring. But the Gen X/Gen Y professors still have at least 15 to 25 years of service left as teachers. So I think we must have compulsory sensitivity training for these people. What say?