We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
I work in a boutique firm known for media and entertainment. I have tried getting through to a Tier 1 team but have not had success so far - and it is hard to expand my practice area in my current firm.
Do what you got in your hand. Optimization should be your mantra, and not chasing the perfect ideal (apart from the fact that there's no universal definition of a 'perfect ideal').
One bird in the hand is better than two in the bush.
I feel corporate law practice is a natural moat, because it's humongous and complicated. Also corporate law practice is not easy for everyone. Additionally, it is something that you can apply to every company irrespective of sector, while having sector specific expertise makes you face even lesser competition.
Media & Entertainment is enjoyable only because it makes you feel very current and contemporary because of the subject matter you deal in. But I see that since the entry barriers for getting into this field are low, sooner or later, it's going to become commoditized. I don't see any differentiating factors. I've seen average joes make good of themselves only because this field is nothing but contracts. Also, since media industry is a tight knit industry, and as the subject matter value is not huge, (after all the entire media industry is smaller than Tata group's capitalization), litigation and arbitration is also very less - because of which absolute nutjobs with poor contract drafting skills are able to survive since their shortcomings never come to light.