We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
(1) CAM
(2) Trilegal
(3) SAM
(4) KCO/AZB (tied)
(6) L&L
(7) JSA.
Leaving Indus out after Avirup’s departure, and keeping LinkLegal and HSA out of it since the question was more on which firms have a good mix of pure projects and projects related corp/M&A practice. Though from what I hear if you are in the projects team at Trilegal or AZB, your role in an M&A deal is more limited to due diligence.
For partners who are equally comfortable in pure projects work and M&A would be quite a small list, and probably include LV, Santosh and Deepto (CAM), Jatin and Neel (SAM), Avirup (L&L).
All inputs valuable.