We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Also, their post claims that aggregate bonus levels for SA's is 100% for CY21. Two points here:
1. Aggregate means that maybe one SA got a massive payout while the others most likely did not, but in aggregate it adds up to 100%. If you dive even deeper, you'll realize that maybe that one team billed much higher than others - which proves my earlier point. Misleading, right?
2. The firm has 4 SA's. In a team of 40+ fee earners. That's a terrible leverage ratio and adds to the possibility that the bonus numbers are likely highly skewed.
- R
@R?
Also, earlier threads on LI suggest that it isn't the best place to work either.
This is the new salary break uo