We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
I am from a non lit vertical and we have not being asked to return to base location.
I agree with KCO PA to the extent that, people should be allowed to be in base / remote location - so long as they can make themselves available for genuine requirements like physically appearing before a court of law.
(Genuine reasons should not include pandering to a clients request to meet them in person for a meeting that can be totally handled over call / email. However if these are far and between I donβt mind flying on for these)
When people from the litigation team are working from their base locations given the need basis requirements (so that they are available if and when required), its only fair that either everyone returns to the base location or that they take a pay cut because clearly βchilling in the comfort of your homes and also not having to spend on additional travel/food/rent expenses that others are spendingβ, shouldnβt pay equally as someone who is willing to show up when work demands or requires. Policies should be same for everyone in an organisation and hence if the litigation teams are in office when required, theres no reason an exception should be made for the other teams. Also, donβt tell me you havent stepped out in the βraging pandemicβ at all because if you, I can smell hypocrisy.
And partners is Trilegal have a say in how they work. Unlike partners in CAM and AZB who are mere workers for the overlord!
I am sad because how will I suck up to seniors and put in facetime without being in office. During WFH everyone only cares about deliverables. Snack breaks are also fewer and further between :-(
Kya milta hai bhai aise afwa phaila ke? Atma ko shanti?
After talking with my team lead, I have come back to Mumbai to vacate my apartment as the office isn't going to open anytime soon.
Sadda kutta kutta...twadda kutta Tommy?
Whatever you are saying is utter BS. What will we do after coming to base location if the office isn't resuming?
Kisi disco mein jaayein? Kisi hotel mein khaayein?
Asking you guy's to come to work is coercive ?, even after paying a six figure salary which no fresher in the industry makes? You all are double vaccinated and young.
"The partners seem to want to control the associates and have them available at their every beck and call, even while the pandemic rages on"
Yeah, that's why you are getting paid. Not to crib here on LI.
That's some good new after long time
I don't know from where you have got your information. You seem to be belonging to some other firm who has heard some fake news.