I go back and re read the Arvind Datar chapter in Indu Bhan's Legal Eagles (https://amzn.to/3z3uzKo) every once in a while. Even from the few times I have bumped into him at conferences or the court, he has been a really nice guy so he is definitely an inspiration in this area.

has to be arvind p datar.
i have not got an opportunity to even talk to him. but he has come up through ranks for sure. by proper hard work and being diligent. have read a lot about him and a lot of his books on taxation.
he was around with legendary nani palkhiwala, so yeah no guess, he is so good

I have been a practicing Advocate, in Delhi for over 7 years now. I have made it here fully on my own, whether it is getting about getting a retainership in a law firm or joining as a junior in an Advocate's chamber or getting my own clients. I am about to write the Advocate on Record examination, this year and that's exactly how far I made it, with my constant perseverance and hard work in the profession.
It is never about anyone else but your belief in yourself.
There are plenty of renowned Ld. Senior Advocates in Delhi who have a roaring practice as of today, while they never had a helping hand, when they started off or even through their journey.
You're dream should be way too precious to even think of giving it up! And just to correct you, no professional circle is tight enough to make a place for yourself, let alone the legal circle. Rather, it's the limited thoughts that are so tightly knit that the courage to follow your dreams, somehow gets lost in the way!

I absolutely adore Mr Datar, he was genuinely nice when I met him, and I was a law student then so in simple terms a nobody. However, the fact his father was in merchant navy would have led to a privileged childhood, and while we cannot chastise him for that but since the question was in a way about privilege that can be taken into account.

Also, don't know about the rest but Gopal Sankaranarayanan and Arundhati Katju come from powerful families. Shouldn't post here for the heck of it.

Gopal S grandfather = one of the first SC judges (P Govinda Menon)==> Former Madras HC barrister and then judge (pre independence King of the Bar) who then gives all his practice to MK Nambiar (father of find out who). Go read any material about PGM

Yes his father was in the services. But generational privilege is not some linear phenomena!!

He's entirely self made. Father in law from the army. Father was in the army also and then in banking. If anyone says he went to an elite law school as they have for Mr. Sondhi - getting into a law school cannot discount ones achievements and it should in fact showcase how he and countless others took a chance on NLS in 1994 when it was such a bizzare concept.

Most people on this list are super privileged [...]. Not to say they aren't decent lawyers and human beings themselves, but let's not pretend they haven't been helped along because papa / mummy made a few calls along the way or that uncles / aunties from the club / network subtly paved the way for their 'relative' success.

This is just how Delhi works and it sucks.

RR yes, but he probably got his jump after becoming ASC for Delhi govt, which gives face time with almost every judge and potential clients/briefing lawyers when you appear in 5-10 matters a day. Pretty sure GS had a role considering RR is entirely disconnected from power echelons and it was a congress govt in Delhi govt at that time. Patronage of big shot seniors is also a privilege, only a few of their juniors among hundreds over the years get that.

Unlikely that this or Sarna’s pedigree have anything to do with them being Counsels at Touchstone Partners, or for that matter, Samiksha being engaged by S&R Associates to this date for some matters. They have horned their skills, put themselves out there and worked really hard. The only credit that can be given to their successful parents is good parenting. Now, if you choose to call these coincidences nepotism, then it’s you with a problem. Not them, not their background or circumstances.

You seem to be harbouring under the misapprehension that family contacts don't become a crucial factor towards career advancement. They do and it's the same all over the world. Of course, to succeed, you still need to be very good at what you do, but the contacts will definitely give you a huge break compared to say a first gen lawyer of equal merit.

How relevant is it to be a Mayawati aide in this day and age? Isn’t UP politics now just a bare-knuckle brawl between the BJP and SP? Is Mayawati even part of the INDI Alliance? I don’t think so 🤷🏼‍♀️

Sure, she’s sitting on obscene wealth—fortified bungalows in Chanakyapuri worth hundreds of crores—and yet somehow, the ED, CBI, and Income Tax all look the other way? Why is that? My guess: she bought peace through silence… and an early, cushioned political retirement.

And honestly, does becoming Advocate General in a state like UP even mean anything once you’re out? Does it bring real career mileage? Does it open doors for your kin, beyond fleeting relevance and name-dropping rights?

How on earth are Bulbul Godiyal or former Senior Advocate Robin Mitra relevant in today’s day and age — and that too, in Delhi? If I were from Lucknow or Allahabad, then perhaps I’d feel some compulsion to offer their children preferential treatment. But here — none of these people (including Sahara) hold any relevance whatsoever.

Samiksha is 100% self-made and, from all accounts, extremely hard-working. At best, the success of her forefathers may have afforded her certain values and a good education — nothing more.

Nikhil Singhvi, on the other hand… why should I waste adjectives when his own words reveal his intellectual heft? Here’s what he recently posted:

“By the time you are done convincing the mobs and the masses about the ill effects of pollution and the need for stringent measures, we’ll all be having irreparable respiratory damage and they still won’t be convinced. Just need some tyranny — a different kind — not the one we have right now!”

So yes — Singhvi wants “a different kind of tyranny.”

Which is fitting, because if intellectual mediocrity were a form of authoritarianism — he’d already be Supreme Leader.

Please study the cause lists carefully. Samiksha is conservatively earning two to three times more than any disputes partner at SR from sarkari/PSU briefs and other sources. To be clear, she is where she is not only because of substantial privilege that generates such referrals, but also because she is an exceptionally hard working attorney.

I doubt Aman’s professional success has anything to do with either parent (or his spouse, an AM Partner) propping him in circles of influence.

Could it just be that Aman was raised right by his Padma Awardee Parents, and groomed well at NLSIU, Harvard and Oxford? Could it just be that he has an aptitude for success in this profession?

And, why has his name even brought here? Aman is above all this court kacheri. From all accounts, he has divorced himself entirely from it and focuses solely on high stake arbitrations. An amicus brief here and there maybe, nothing more…Not even a Senior Advocate!

So, move on!

That's half the story. HMJVM was an upright and no nonsense judge - which, let's face it, isn't everyone's cup of tea. Lumpen elements which thrive in this lousy status quo staged protests against him. Tanmaya has picked up the best from his dad and is an outstanding litigator. He'll go far.

Just to clarify this calumny doing the rounds - Gopal Sankaranarayanan IS NOT Venugopal's nephew. Venugopals nephew is Vijay Narayan, the ex Advocate General of Madras.
Gopals father was in the IAS and retired in the early 90s before Gopal even joined Law School. His dad had been suspended from service by the Bangarappa government and Venugopal appeared for him in the Supreme Court.
Of course, Gopal is close to Venugopal, but that's because KKV demands such affection, and not only from his own chamber.
To shift from Bangalore to Delhi and start from scratch isn't easy. Rajshekar, Sidharth Agarwal, Jayant Mehta and others have their families in Delhi and that went a long way in building practise. Owning a home and having family support is a big thing in this profession, especially in Delhi. You won't find anybody who made it senior like Gopal did with such few years of active practise - he took 2 full years off from 2004-2006 to see whether he wanted to come back to law. Check his YouTube interviews out.

When Supreme Court said that basic structure can't be amended by legislature Mrs gandhi tried to make a larger bench to overrule it and punished judges who delivered keshvanand bharti but didn't succumb to pressure tactics in juxtapose see what Mr did when Supreme Court turned down NJAC that guy didn't even tried to pass a law to negate it's effect that is the difference. Had this Constitution not been here Modi never have become prime minister let alone winning it again against the club of dynasties united. If Constitution and democracy has least danger from anyone that is Mr Modi. And i haven't taken the name of emergency yet.

So basically, no one. Didn’t need to start a post on this one to know the answer.

Delhi litigation is a joke and I hear Bombay isn’t too far either, everyone who makes it is incredibly privileged, they become senior advocates basis clients and court appearances arranged through their contacts and home dinners over the years, have offices and chambers ready for them, can work ‘hard’ for years with less pay because they don’t have to earn, have flunkies writing publications for them, get into top colleges because of references written by daddy’s friends, then scholarships also approved by daddy’s friends which is when they pretend to be poor and/or from academic / government service families, ultimately reach wherever they wanted to - as you seriously have to be dumb to not do well after this much privilege and time / exposure, and then their flunkies mention how brilliant they are.

As a wise client once told me, Nothing looks good like success .. so let’s not be in a constant state of delusion about what self-made actually looks like.

Don’t wish to discourage kids with normal family backgrounds wanting to get into Litigation, but be very careful and ready for all this.

A large number of people seem to be commenting about privileged back-grounds. Being related to a judge/ senior advocate/ advocate/ law firmtypes is definitely a fillip to the initial days of practice. As is being related to a bureaucrat, coming from a rich background. When one asks this question of "self made", I would hope that we go beyond just looking at a background or relation, but analyze how a person has used it.

For instance, there are children of judges (notable amongst them being Arunav Patnaik, when Justice AK Patnaik was elevated to the SC), who chose to withdraw from practicing in a court which was their primary court of practice because they didn't want to be seen as being "favoured". Of course - practicing in a city different from your parent(s) city can also lead to briefs coming your way from familial contacts, but one really needs to see how these things have been eschewed.

Similarly, for those laying a smackdown on bureaucrat/ industrialist/ rich person kids also need to see whether they're on a state/ PSU panel, or whether mommy has provided a steady stream of clients. In that sense, I would hope that you fellows stop false equivalencing "self made" with rags to riches.

Anyway - on my list of self-made lawyers, apart from those mentioned here, would be a whole bunch of others who I wouldn't wish to unleash a horde of LI trolls on. All I am saying is that there are a lot of us, and we have all struggled to find clients and command a fee, which piddlu kids of senior advocates get for the asking, as a second brief to dad.

The term "self made" is a misnomer in its self.

No body is self made because a human being is not an island.

We are at the end of the day a sum total of many things and each one contributes to what we end up becoming ranging from our own competence, our parents, our spouse to even the location where we were brought up or stay.

A more apt statement would be that some people reach their true potential while others don't.

Jayna Kothari is coming from an extremely privileged background. Of using her uncle's office from the start, as he is one of the founder partners at the Mulla and Mulla. ▮▮▮ A lot more privileges to begin with, before she got an opportunity to make a mark in her litigation practice.

[...] Pay is minimal, was kicked out after completing 3 months in the name of assessment internship which initially was for a month only. Freshers or tax enthusiasts please stay away from govt counsel practice as its more about updating the compliances than tax appal or replies.

I have heard about this independent counsel at the SC- Pijush Kanti Roy who has the same rags to riches story. I know Mr. Roy because I usually sit in Library No. 2 at the Supreme Court and he is very well known as a counsel. He is perhaps one of the few non-senior-designated advocates who have the distinct privilege of getting called by their name and not merely as Mr. Counsel. Though he is not an AOR, the legend in Library No. 2 goes that his family started from the turmoil of the 1971 Indo-Pak War, went to a municipality school, studied on scholarship all throughout his life, and even went to Helsinki on a 100% student-scholarship. He then straightaway came to SC to practice and was briefly a junior to Retd. Justice SB Sanyal. Today, he holds a major chunk of briefs at the SC because of his robust counsel practice and is on the legal advisory boards of many governmental, national, and international organizations. He usually keeps a hush-hush profile but, is a major inspiration for many first-gen lawyers like me, who wish to practice at the SC. Nice person to have a cup of coffee with :)

There is no denying his prominence, nor his status as a preferred choice before the NCLAT and NCLT. I, however, harbour serious misgivings about the foundations of this reputation. Anyone seeking clarity would do well to observe his arguments in the courtroom through the VC links available on the NCLT and NCLAT causelists. What presents itself is less a display of legal acumen and more a spectacle of speaking over opposing counsel and advancing convenient falsehoods in the pursuit of interim relief. If such conduct is now considered the hallmark of effective advocacy, then the man is indeed stellar. He appears unhinged; and if the system has failed to recognise that his word is far from gospel, given the manner in which he conducts his affairs in court, then it is not merely the individual that warrants concern—it is the system itself that stands revealed as deeply compromised and fundamentally flawed.

Both these tribunals are, in their functioning, a poor reflection of the Modi Sarkar. Spend a week in these forums and one quickly realises that the Companies Act and its accompanying rules are effectively toothless, rarely—if ever—invoked with meaningful consequence against fraud and corporate malfeasance. Relegating corporate disputes to these forums amounts, in effect, to granting bad actors a free pass to run companies in whatever manner they deem fit, with little fear of consequence.