We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
What about this other agency? Again, a little dubious because the founders barely have any experience themselves, so not sure if they're in any position to be giving gyaan.
1. Too many of the founders' posts simple peddle a "work hard" narrative that feeds into a feeling of FOMO. In a nearly dead job market, it makes students feel that they are the issue. You're simply not doing enough, so here's a boot camp to work on yourself. It's predatory.
2. The founders push a simple narrative structure with each post. I did [thing]. I failed at [thing]. I, like you, was a failure because of my inability to do [thing]. I discovered [a secret]and now I can do [thing]. Wonder how you can be a part of this elite club of former failures? Pay us [x amount] and we will let you in on [the secret]. This tells young students that they're being left out of something they didn't even know they needed in the first place.
3. [...] No M&A attorney at that level knows what it is like to "make it". With all my years behind me, I don't claim to know half of what makes someone successful enough to be emulated by impressionable students. Because of this, the entire goalpost of WW is to get students 'law-firm ready' whatever that means. Anyone already in a law firm knows that you learn on the job and no amount of training can prepare you beforehand. Students don't know this and think that simply getting into a law firm equates to success. Kids are therefore being sold a lofty dream that doesn't translate to reality.
In sum, I congratulate the entrepreneurial spirit of lawyers who don't want to grind it out at a law firm. But I cannot in good faith appreciate a business model that runs on pushing a pipe dream to students who have to borrow money from parents to watch high resolution videos of Gopal Sankaranarayanan.
My views resonate the same
worldwise courses are relatively cheaper than lawsikho. spending anything more than 2-3000 on such courses is waste. take your gf out on a date instead.
Better you burn that 3K.
Do you know any guy who ditched his girlfriend for not having a job? Rarely. The other way round always happen.
No need to be super woke and politically correct all the time.
The reverse happens on a daily basis. Either you are trying to make a shit show or you don't know anything about the world you are living in and living in a dreamy PC paradise.
It's not a question whether girls can pay the bill or not. A Guy's chance of getting kicked out is almost very high when he doesn't get a job. Not the other way around.
https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/177006-How-are-lawsikho-courses-
(Link to post : https://www.linkedin.com/posts/saahil-dama-b59b2019b_all-the-lawyers-that-we-created-courses-with-activity-6806474155723128832-XGIj)