We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
I was working on a PE/VC transaction representing the Company. The investor counsels finally gave the greenlight and I was supposed to circulate the document for signing. It was Diwali Time and I was in celebration mood. So I didn't check the pre-execution versions thoroughly and just updated the placeholders, formatting etc. and circulated the transaction documents for signing on DocuSign. The investor counsel calls me few days later saying that clause referencing on the circulated doc is incorrect and to edit it in the final doc. I started checking the document to correct the clause referencing and meanwhile realised that there was a major fuck up - i.e. while I was formatting the document before circulating on DocuSign, I had also deleted several important clauses like liquidation preference, pre-emptive right etc. by mistake. Now the document I had circulated on DocuSign to all parties didn't have these clauses and only I knew it. I couldn't cancel the DocuSign document since majority of signatories have already signed it and also since Promoter had wanted the document executed on Dhanteras, which day had already passed by then. I was afraid that the investor/their counsels/client/ Partner will find out and was super stressed. Once the document was fully executed on DocuSign, I downloaded it and tried editing it. But since few clauses were missing in entirety, editting was difficult since DocuSign had the envelope ID on top - which meant I couldnt add a new page in between with the missing clauses. In the end I finally added pages in between and copy pasted the DocuSign envelope ID to the new pages so that it didn't look like it has been added. But still because of these clauses insertions in between the formatting ended up very fucked up - by which I dreaded my opposing counsels would figure out the manipulation I did to the document. I sent the updated executed doc to investor counsels and dreaded their call regarding the docs. Finally days passed and investor counsel didn't notice and nobody noticed and finally I felt relieved π ..
Also, forthrightly (we've all done it) blaming IT is the easiest thing to do when you've screwed up; the thing about making a change but it not showing up is probably because the change needed to be made in multiple places not just one.
Please if somebody can answer these questions.
Madras hyd is 12
Seems like Jurisphere for all its marketing belongs squarely in the camp of a highly exaggerated wrapper. Wish we had better players in the space.
GEM or General, Engineer, Male are stood on a lower pedestal than non-GEM
I understand about the rationale in Article 15(3) but how can engineers be covered under it?
And Why?
If the judiciary was really concerned it would have taken action when Grassroot and it's lapdog police openly facilitated the denigration of the judiciary and a certain judge. Also if there was substance to the allegations made by the Grassroot against that judge then SC should have inquired and settled the matter.
We can rant, fume, call out. But SC and others in power will always protect and nurture their interests. Ofc with rhetorical flourishes that it is all for aam admi.
It will repeat for Grassroot too and later Saffron Bros. For now Nagpur wants Grassroot to continue. Everything else happening is entertainment, such or otherwise.
I am Groot.
- Rhodes scholar
- Fellow at Columbia University
- Internationally acclaimed for her role in the 377 case
- First openly LGBTQIA++ lawyer in India to be designated as a Senior Advocate
- Fighting fearlessly against the BJP on behalf of liberal and secular forces
And yet nobodies on LI criticise her. π
2. Plan your internships accordingly, look for places that have vacancies (specially if you're in your 4th year), don't just apply and intern.
3. Stand out in your internships from the other candidates, make your face value, be sharp and consistent. Dress Well.
Means ig it is still considered as a one of the good law colleges in india
What's the ground reality??
In-house they usually look for prosecution + contractual work. But honestly, those kind of jobs are very limited. Cause unless its pharma (B2C) or FMCG company, they usually do not need an inhouse dedicated resource for IP.
So best bet is to do something apart from IP.
GIVE NUMBERS MAN
On Cravath scale base + bonus + spl bonus subject to meeting hours = $332,000
Additional cost of living allowances to London offices around $40,000 - $80,000
Roughly Β£300,000 exact figures depend on exchange rate
And don't lionise the SC. It is part of the same rotten system. Just wait for the hearing on Feb 3.
https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/i-pac-raids-trinamool-chief-justice-on-stage-mamata-banerjees-protect-from-agencies-appeal-10771248?pfrom=home-ndtv_topscroll