We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
I wanted to ask - Is there any law firms for TMT that offer online internship?
But is this all hogwash? Remember how the Rizwanur murder case got buried and almost all the IPS officers esp the senior ones not only got off the hook but even got rewarded with plum postings? Kindness even promoted and made Ministers out of IAS and IPS folks who killed off inquiries in the much discussed and weaponized Bantala, IPS Mehta, Singur, Nandigram etc cases.
Go back further. The Left did zilch to police folks who committed atrocious excesses in the name of anti Naxal operations and Marichjhapi massacres.
Hence will the histories of gimmick and hollow promises repeat (esp when the role CBI in RG Kar is not being scrutinized) or is the wheel getting broken this time?
Domestically it happens. CBI, ED, IT, NIA, Vigilance....everyone is a sinner or will be one (e.g. TVK)
Objectively, not a stitch-up all along (he was charged under the Biden administration); subjectively, you decide ;)
Also- i only have experience in direct tax. For IDT I think LKS is the only option. There are a few tier one firms with a good DT practice though.
Some people have got over 5k as yearly deduction cumulatively for making mistakes, not answering the partners phone calls, coming 5 mins late to office etc
Sad state of affairs
This is so funny
For seniors who were part of top moot teams: what actually separates an average researcher from an elite one?
What specific skills, habits, resources, or approaches should I focus on from first year itself? How do top researchers build their reputation within a law school ecosystem?
Would also appreciate advice on:memorial drafting,case law research,arbitration moots,legal writing,database usage,and becoming someone teams can genuinely rely on under pressure. Technology to be used everything which falls under research work.
No Indian uni has only online end sem exam.
My present work is largely focused on road infrastructure arbitration, with limited exposure to broader civil/commercial litigation and almost no trial court work. I am keen to join a chamber with more varied matters and better overall court exposure.
Any recommendations or leads would be greatly appreciated.
But there have been cases where a counsel has become a partner after 2-3 years. so alot of factor at play for this.
Need genuine advice please. Want to chart out my career projectory.
You will make it, just know the bad feeling eventually passes if you want it to.
As a stakeholder in the system, one without a godfather or political connections, i too am embarrassed. Embarrassed to be part of a system that confers substantial advantages on the privileged while denying others panel work and opportunities, often with contempt and indifference.
I am also embarrassed by what the likes of Saurabh Bharadwaj are resorting to: openly taunting judicial pronouncements and observations made by a sitting High Court judge, even post recusal.
Context- https://youtu.be/JJ8Vr5GsvZw
I feel conflicted. I do not like the AAP, nor do I believe they were right in the manner in which they conducted themselves before Justice Sharma. Yet, ironically, it is only through their brand of politics and dirty tricks that the interests of lawyers like me ie. those without backing, struggling for work and denied panel appointments or meaningful opportunities are being indirectlyacknowledged, even if only by 0.1%.
After the 2008 fin crisis several such mergers and buyouts had happened. Even earlier when many so called universities mushroomed out of what were essentially colleges, it eventually led to a crack down and clean up.
But it is true the situation is worrisome. Chinese and Indian students along with some others bring in the moolah that kept these universities going. After all we pay 3-4 times the fee that UK national pay. Add to that the cost of living etc. Scholarships sound fancy but are meagre percentage. Also most scholarships are small bursaries and very few are what folks understand as "full scholarships".
Time to wise up.
STEM departments boost rankings and their students and faculty are seen as less agitation-oriented than humanities students and faculty. Also, their employment rate is usually 100%. You probably have better job prospects as a Cranfield MSc in Aerospace Engineering over an Oxbridge MA in Philosophy or History (at least salary-wise). So KCL decided to acquire this rather than, say, SOAS or some theatre or art school. Since Cranfield is postgrad-only, they expect the people there to boost research rankings. Another advantage of STEM departments is that they can raise revenue through industrial consultancies. MIT and Stanford are obviously the gold standard, but even Cranfield does projects for aviation and military companies. They won’t be dependent on subsidies and handouts, which SOAS probably would.
Thus, OP’s concerns are more valid for pure-play humanities colleges like SOAS. For example, the UK’s top divinity school, Heythrop College, which was part of the University of London, has shut down completely.
How did one forget how Cal HC judges deemed to be anti establishment by puny little Green wo/men were heckled by Kindness acolytes inside and outside courtrooms and court premises? Did we also forget how Choti Chata police stood by and did zilch? And how can we forget how CP and the entire senior brass could do zilch with regime supported folks who put up posters against Justice Mantha including walls of Cal HC.
I personally prefer the law of contempt to be binned. After all the legislature and the executive don't have it and hopefully would never enact one for self preservation. And the judiciary often weaponizes it. But have forgotten how Kindness herself slandered judges deemed hostile to her shenanigans?
And now the gall to use court as some publicity stunt to keep her flock of wayward sheep together. Actually it started with an indulgent SC and regime friendly judges in Cal HC who gave her and apparatchiks a long rope.
#Reapwhatyousow
From what I’ve heard, LKS seems to offer a steeper learning curve because of the volume and variety of matters. It also appears that direct tax is a relatively larger practice there, which may translate into better long-term growth opportunities.
On the other hand, CAM is known to compensate better, though I’ve heard the direct tax team is comparatively smaller and progression beyond the PA level can sometimes be slower.
Would love to hear from people who’ve worked at either place or have insights on the kind of work, learning, and growth at both firms.
https://www.legalitysimplified.com/ugc-calls-for-bharatiya-nyaya-sanhita-studies/
The actual UGC notification is here:
https://www.ugc.gov.in/pdfnews/1707526_Bhartiya-Nyaya-Sanhita-Studies-in-law-Curricula.pdf
Two things:
> This is the power and impact of NFSU
> Any postings on forensic sciences and NFSU are therefore unquestionably relevant on this platform