We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
We've been working on similar problems for Indian lawyers, particularly legal research, drafting and citation verification. One thing we've found is that getting a convincing-looking AI answer is relatively easy. Making sure the authorities actually exist and support the proposition is much harder.
We've tried to build around that, while keeping the product affordable for individual advocates. There's a free tier if anyone wants to compare the workflows themselves.
I'd genuinely be interested in hearing what people here find useful or unreliable in these tools, particularly for litigation work.
https://lawgichub.com