We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
1. Phone calls are made to powerful people to get the officer responsible for the inspection punished and transferred????
2. Action is taken by the government, but both firms engage top Senior Advocates and get an SC order staying the government order???
3. An internal investigation is carried out to to find out which associates squealed, or all associates are punished en masse by freezing increments for next two years???
https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/2-gurugram-law-firms-get-notice-for-violating-50-wfh-order-as-air-worsens-12295801/amp/1
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/gurgaon/gurgaon-law-firms-flout-50-wfh-rule-disgruntled-employees-tip-off-caqm-inspections-find-160-of-262-trilegal-staff-and-87-of-117-jsa-employees-in-office-both-firms-get-showcause-notices/amp_articleshow/135630790.cms