We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
I've been building LawgicHub AI for the last two years, and we've spent a lot of that time working with Indian lawyers trying to understand what actually makes these tools useful in practice.
We've built legal research, drafting, document review, citation verification and case tracking into one workspace, with a free tier so advocates can properly try it without committing to another subscription.
But I'm curious about the broader experience here. Research seems like the obvious use case, except you still have to verify the authorities. Drafting saves time, but everyone has their own formats. And I'm not convinced lawyers necessarily want another platform to manage their matters.
For those who've tried Draft Bot Pro, Jhana, ChatGPT, LawgicHub or anything else, what are you actually using regularly?
And what's stopping you from using these tools more? Accuracy, quality of output, pricing, or just that they don't fit into how you already work?
I'd genuinely appreciate hearing from practising advocates, including anyone who's tried LawgicHub and found it lacking. I'm happy to answer questions about the product too.