We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
From an in-house client perspective - they prefer AZB and SAM for quality and innovativeness
Khaitan works on volumes so quality of work product is average. Partners are not savvy
Trilegal does not have the variety bench strength and they generally seem to pick up grade 2 or grade 3 players from tier 1 and have them lead a team.
Saraf ans luthra are now preferred only for small matters.
CAM pricing is best but too many exits and no star players anymore.
LKS for tax and anti dumping only
2) KCO >/= AZB
2) SAM >/= JSA
Khimani and Khimani
LKS
Khaitan
Trilegal
Saraf
Luthra
SAM
CAM