Read 23 comments as:
Filter By
Because your money is not good enough for those who will get to judge you.
A โ–ฎโ–ฎโ–ฎ person is incapable of exercising restraint.
I swear. These โ–ฎโ–ฎโ–ฎ need to be blacklisted.
Even migrants to the gulf havent brought this much dishonour.
And why should somebody from an upper middle class to affluent background have to worry about that?
Well the irony is whe same BBC made a movie on Modi's involvement in Gujarat riots the government banned it can we also talk about that ?
Assuming such were the absurd standards, then, today, even the elites would lose any possibility of getting a passport. They have done such harm to our reputation abroad that we find Indian specific advisory on conduct all across.
Wait until you realise that you wonโ€™t be among the chosen few either and that there is nothing you can do to change it.
Sanjay, if he had exercised more restraint and was more politically sensitive, could have been a PM instead of Rajiv
And britishers wanted to limit colonisation by non-EIC Europeans coming to this country because they thought the riff raff would drop the image of British in India.
I would totally support this even today.

Would spare everyone having to deal with the extremely annoying and embarrassing gujju groups all over
Sanjay Gandhi was more based than Bhajipao. Riffraff who cannot sustain children and refuse to change their ways, should have 1 child policy (although 0 is ideal)
And his grandson Sanjay took it a step further by sterilising the so-called riff raff. But today these masses ironically form the bedrock of the Congress vote, while the affluent elites support the BJP. ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ
The sources are cited in the article itself. At least read before commenting.
Why downvote the truth? Nehru was an elitist who looked down on people he perceived as riff raff.
So someone said this and you amplify it, without even knowing its true or not?