Read 15 comments as:
Filter By
A 4-word comment posted 2 months ago was not published.
AILET is conducted much more professionally than CLAT. Also, it's not good for aspirants to have their fate decided by a single exam. There should be at least 3-4 meaningful exams to reduce pressure on candidates. See what is happening with NEET.
If so many aspirants are getting adversely affected, then why isn't any of them going to the court?
OP probably missed NALSAR and couldnt convert AILET into NLUD so now they are having this thought.

Although I do support the merger. It won't happen until more people press on it.
none of them other than NLUD are relevant enough for people to undertake a separate exam for them. CLAT is how they get their seats filled.
Exactly. Hence the older NLUs had to join the newer ones in an MOU to have CLAT.
Every NLU except the ones that had been set up before the SC judgement mandating CLAT literally can have separate exams. That's how law works. They choose not to.