Read 9 comments as:
Filter By
I believe MB being an AOR might have little more edge purely in terms of SC work and is a 3rd gen lawyer as well.

No idea about NN.
From what i see NN has ibc practise and MB has more lit matters. Someone plz verify and clarify.
This really feels like a modern day shyel trehan-diya kapur moment. Both are really good at their work. Who you choose should be based on if the style of working matches.
Neither is better, both operate in different areas of law and to a large extent, separate forums as well. Please see which resonates better for you.
As pointed out by someone, both have went separate ways. Request someone who has worked with them to shed light on which one is the better place to be for litigation?

Thanks!
yes please if anybody have insight really helpful

imma thinking of applying to firm and who is good in long run NN or MB
Firm has shut down, both have started separate Chambers.
One of the co-founders has opened another firm and the website of NMLC is down. Has the firm shutdown or only NN has left? Any particular reason for the breakup? How is NMLC doing now (if it is active that is)?