We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
And don't stress about this now. Just do your best at your courses and take things slowly and with time.
For seniors who were part of top moot teams: what actually separates an average researcher from an elite one?
What specific skills, habits, resources, or approaches should I focus on from first year itself? How do top researchers build their reputation within a law school ecosystem?
Would also appreciate advice on:memorial drafting,case law research,arbitration moots,legal writing,database usage,and becoming someone teams can genuinely rely on under pressure. Technology to be used everything which falls under research work.