We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Won't comment on your political learnings and logic because one has the right to believe in things they want to believe but current party is worst as far as nepotism is concerned. Government panels cough SKS, Sports Boards, Corporation Boards and studying/settling abroad while doing absolutely nothing for improving the quality of life and focusing on Hindu-Muslim.
I am an independent lawyer. I have earned every Tier 1 law firm role I secured and every client referral. I even graduated from a Tier 1 university. How is it that when I apply for any government panel, I get zilch, whereas people with no prior experience or credentials get empanelled, and receive sarkar work worth crores of rupees?
I have no love or sympathy for Arvind Kejriwal. I have voted for him only twice, and I donโt see myself ever voting for him again after seeing videos of his Sheeshmahal in Civil Lines - https://youtu.be/czEBDNRYHBg
It is under these circumstances that his demand for recusal, which tbh stands on flimsy grounds (legally speaking), resonates with me - https://youtu.be/BMBPoqkfzWc
Am I alone here?