We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Ex Facie these judicial proceedings are very unsettling. Justice cannot look like this. Did this litigant manage to speak at all during the hearing. And Open Justice means that people watching should be able to understand what happened. But without knowing the contents of the petition, we don't know anything. And if a litigant is being described as a blackmailer by the Court, he should at least be heard first. The most basic principle of law and justice that no man will be condemned unheard has not been followed here.
In many jurisdictions including the US, court petitions are accessible to the public on court websites. We need to do this in India as well. Justice needs to be open. Justice must always be seen to be done.
https://youtube.com/shorts/8bSbj0NRel4?si=gYr_KjA3JLxtdpnd