We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
On the point about repetitive work: allocation depends on skill, reliability, and performance. Those demonstrating capability are entrusted with more substantive technology law and complex litigation work. At the same time, broader exposure is available depending on team requirements and individual ability.
In terms of mentorship and team culture, the environment is professional, collaborative, and hands-on. For the most accurate perspective, it is advisable to speak with current team members.
As far as PPOs are concerned, the process is aligned with the firm’s standard policy. Internships are routed through HR, and PPOs depend on performance, availability, and team requirements.
Work allocation is driven by client needs, timelines, and competence. Different team members lead matters based on the nature of the task and their experience.
All disputes teams across every firm have some niche or the other and in most cases they grow boring and repetitive. That’s how these teams can pay out so well because they can churn out a ton of work because of the nature of repeat games. Don’t fool yourself into thinking that any other team is better or for that matter worse. It’s all the same. Please leave these juvenile questions aside and ask yourself where you are placed socially and economically and then take a decision that gives you the best of both.
If money isn’t a concern