We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
they did not give us a good valedictory ceremony, THEY DID NOT GIVE THE SEMI FINALISTS CERTIFICATES, and as soon as the so called ceremony was over, the ▮▮▮ disappeared and threw the other OC members under the bus when the participants started questioning
If ₹8,000 “includes accommodation” but 75% of teams never reach the stage where accommodation is even relevant, then what exactly was that component for? Either the accommodation cost was negligible (so why advertise it as included?), or teams paid for a service they were structurally eliminated from accessing.
That means remaining teams paid the full ₹8,000 — but did not qualify.
If accommodation is part of the fee structure, and a team doesn’t advance to the stage where accommodation is actually required, why is there no partial refund? What exactly is being paid for in such cases?