We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
I have interned in a boutique firm dealing with IBC which created my strong interest in IBC Law but have been hearing a lot about how it is a dead practice area in general with no growth or scope in future. Should I build my CV around IBC or should explore something else?
at least in M&A you can do some good deals; the same goes with capital markets.
lit side of ibc is just too streamlined same vohi applications SRA fighting to get the resolution plan approved blah blah blah.
soon you will realise that you will left with nothing and will be later on look for another avenue or switch as it will just waste time and you will remain in the same position as you were in starting, ultimately its your call
even if you become IP, it's not gonna add that much value trust me you will be just another kathpiutli of creditors.