We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
How can we believe him?
Nevertheless, at least some reforms have been accepted.
If only he put in so much thought to revive the economy (as is his job)
As for 80 percent of legal work being done thru AI ...true, entire documents can be drafted by AI, they can clearly replicate the drafts of great books like tejoriwala, d'souza, or atkins, but then sir, someone has to correct it and all. Court work will.not go away. Lawyers are still needed. Substantial work will go yes. But still human level supervision would be needed. Useless clerical law firm work like mergers etc can go to Ai, but litigation not so easily and soon
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVKHx241Nzc
https://www.financialexpress.com/jobs-career/education-pms-economic-advisor-sanjeev-sanyal-calls-upsc-pursuit-a-complete-waste-of-time-why-he-said-so-4091750/