We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
- Rahul Gandhi
- Akhilesh Yadav
- Tejaswi Yadav
- Udaynidhi Stalin
- Prashant Kishore
- Abhishek Banerjee
- Kanhaiya Kumar
- Umar Khalid
- Chandrasekhar Azad Ravan
- Raghav Chaddha
Or are we yet to see this person??!!
So yes, the answer is clear: Rahul Gandhi is India’s Zoran Mamdani.
Be that as it may, however, I agree that the application of a troll tag is deeply disappointing and should be reversed immediately. Flagging legitimate speech like this which, whatever the quality of the argument(s), is on topic, is as bad as the practice that some U.S. testing agencies (like the LSAC) had at one time of flagging the LSAT results profiles of disabled test-takers to law schools to show that reasonable accommodations had been implemented.
www.telegraphindia.com/world/why-mamata-banerjee-could-have-been-new-york-city-mayor-in-place-of-zohran-mamdani-photogallery-prnt/cid/2131375