Read 19 comments as:
Filter By
You don’t get to coerce speech in this country. Too bad so sad for you.
It’s the Gen Z crowd that glorifies such people as “eminent jurists” and “eminent activists” on the basis of a few tweets. Then proceeds to brand them as “toxic” and cancels them — also on the basis of a few tweets! 🙈
Standing with the victim means blindly trusting that the allegations are true, the alleged perpetrator has infact committed the offence, and openly declaring he is a serial offender, all that without there being no other evidence than the alleged victim's statement itself?
Exactly. Rohin never meant shit against the RW juggernaut.
Yes. That was the argument from me too. You believed story about Weinstein and Cosby because many many people came forward.
A 16-word comment posted 10 months ago was not published.
▮▮▮. no person 2-3 years in the profession is "formidable". have u seen his general insta / twitter posts. just ▮▮
A 6-word comment posted 10 months ago was not published.
A 15-word comment posted 10 months ago was not published.
A 7-word comment posted 10 months ago was not published.
A 29-word comment posted 10 months ago was not published.
Did anyone spot this sentence in Rohin’s statement:

“While I have messages which reflect the nature of our interactions, I’m choosing not to share them out of respect for her privacy.”

This almost sounds like a veiled threat? 😳
So now the bar is that unless multiple victims are testifying, the allegations of offences should be kept in abeyance? Much wow! Objective indeed.