We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Second, as lawyers don't you all think that the SC erred in its decision to include the allegation in his resume, evenif it was a mere allegation? How can you, as law students, not question the decision of the Apex Court when it ordered the inclusion of an "allegatio"n in his Resume, even when it was never proved as sacrosanct. As students of NUJS we should also think about it.
Third, you all are 'frustrated' with the lack financial transparency in his tenure. Why has no RTI been filed demanding for such transparency??
Fourth, "systematic pattern of administrative failure" is highly subjective as it is too wide enough to understand the series of events which led to such exasperation. As students of law dont you think that you should have categorically enlisted those demands and claimed that with all logic and your legal acumen?
As prospective lawyers such questions must be clear in the minds of our young students, otherwise it would simply mean beating the drums with others without even applying your own legal acumen behind it.
Kindly ask these questions to the students protesting.