We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
The court went on to document instances where District Judges received High Court Judges at railway stations and waited on them with refreshments - practices that it described as perpetuating "colonial decadence" and reinforcing a "sense of entitlement."
Even when District Judges are deputed to the High Court registry, they are often not offered a seat and, on rare occasions when they are, they hesitate to sit, said the court. This systemic inequality, the court stated, has led to complete psychological enslavement, where the District Judiciary operates under a constant fear of displeasing the High Court.
https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/savarnas-and-shudras-madhya-pradesh-high-court-slams-judiciarys-power-dynamics-8953266?pfrom=home-ndtv_topscroll