We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
What about the woman who married some dumbass because everyone told her not to wait till she's a depressed cat lady and after a few years of stress coping with him and very difficult in-laws, gave birth with difficulty only to have all these goons turn on her so that she had to go through an ugly divorce while caring for babies? Your interpretation will be that she is now depressed because she doesn't have a husband but actually the mental peace once he was gone and raising the kid with her friends and extended family is much happier for her. Her only mistake was getting pressured into marriage.
Also the women who married someone who beats her because everyone rushed her into it with this same fear mongering. I am sure she dreams of cats instead of her terrifying husband but is too scared to leave him.
And the women who are just not happy because everyone said companionship = husband and child and really they just miss their friends and independence from being a full time nanny. Why are they not on the depressed list?
By the way, I have never met an unhappy cat lady. Why do people dunk on them? Jealousy?
1. A successful woman partner in a law firm sank into depression and alcoholism because she couldn’t get married. She only wanted someone who was her financial and intellectual equal, but such guys were taken. So she waited and waited until it was too late.
2. Another such person was divorced and childless. Her husband dumped her for someone younger and more attractive. She was hugely successful, but very depressed for lack of companionship and family. She eventually chose to adopt a child and raise the child as a single mom.
3. Another lady adopted cats and her life revolves around them.
Please don’t dismiss the womanly need for child-rearing and companionship because of what you come across in feminist textbooks and TikTok reels.
Reason 1: Lifestyle Neglect.
The Instagram optics are carefully curated — Euro trips, brunches, designer hauls. But behind the filters lies visible burnout. Erratic routines, stress-lined faces, and the unmistakable toll of an overextended, undernourished life. A Pilates reel doesn’t cancel out cortisol.
Reason 2: Emotional Intelligence? Missing in Action.
Some of the lowest EQ I’ve encountered has come wrapped in the gloss of professional achievement. Reading cues, taking “no” with grace, knowing when to exit a dead conversation — basic stuff. You think Delhi boys struggle with rejection? Try saying “no thanks” to a 30-something litigator. Suddenly, you’re the clueless peasant who dared to turn down royalty. Believe me — I have the receipts.
Reason 3: No Off-Switch.
Especially in corporate law — where work and identity have fused into a single, exhausting persona. Dates often feel like diligence calls. Legalese over linguine. At some point, I started wondering if I’d accidentally walked into a strategy meeting.
Reason 4: Hypergamy — and the Fallout.
Yes, it exists. Let’s stop pretending it doesn’t. It’s a wrecking ball that no one has the courage to ackno- until it’s too late.
Reason 5: Misandry Dressed as Empowerment.
Independence is great. Strength is magnetic. But there’s a growing trend of casual man-bashing being passed off as feminist sass. It’s not edgy. It’s not evolved. It’s just… tired.
And here’s the part no one wants to say out loud: many of these women don’t actually want a partner — or certainly not a male one. What they’re seeking isn’t intimacy, but affirmation. That they’re smarter, sharper, more enlightened than whoever sits across the table. And if he won’t flatter, submit, or play along — he’s swiftly labelled “insecure,” “misogynist,” or “just not enough.”
The truth? Some of them would be far happier if everyone — including their well-meaning friends and family — stopped trying to match them up. Let them own their solo arc. It’s perfectly fine to be a cat mom, dog mom, or cause crusader — provided you actually have the time, energy, and emotional bandwidth to care. It’s not a failure. It’s just a choice.
There’s something quietly alarming about how you’ve framed this: a whole group of accomplished women in law are being reduced to a kind of curiosity because they haven’t “settled down” by their late 30s or 40s. Why is that even the lens? Do we pause to dissect the life paths of single men in litigation? Do we ask whether they’ll adopt or become “dog dads”? No, we just assume they’re focused, driven, or haven’t met the right person yet. The same grace doesn’t seem to apply here.
And the list of “reasons” you rattle off like demanding hours, intimidating men, high expectations, physical appearance, really just blames women for their own singleness in a hundred passive-aggressive ways. It completely ignores the structural and cultural double standards that exist in law (and society). Maybe some of these women didn’t want to get married? Maybe they had partners but didn’t see marriage as essential? Maybe they did want it and life just worked out differently? Or maybe they’re tired of being told their life is incomplete unless it follows a specific, socially approved script.
Also, the idea that these women now need to pick between IVF, adoption, being a “cat mother,” or throwing themselves into social service... it’s honestly quite patronising. Their lives aren’t some backup plan in motion. They’re already full and complex. Fulfilment doesn’t hinge on marriage or children for everyone, and it certainly shouldn’t be the only frame through which we assess women’s choices. If you're genuinely curious about gender patterns in the legal profession, there’s a meaningful way to have that conversation. But this post? It’s steeped in subtle (and not-so-subtle) sexism. Might be worth sitting with that discomfort a bit.
Settle for less, or regret forever.
Moderator- Post this. These selfish people need to be called out for what they are. Ungrateful opportunists. Leeches.
50% lawyer girls marry someone from college
15% lawyer girls marry someone from work
15% lawyer girls marry someone from outside, like a social acquaintance or someone from a dating app
10% lawyer girls go in for an arranged marriage
10% lawyer girls stay single lifelong
So odds reduce if you don’t meet someone in uni.
Of course, if the only way you and your pals can get women to marry you is to scare them by saying they can't have children any other way then you do you.
But power-partner babes, ignore these idiots. The world is your oyster.
I can hire and pay men to do the things I need done. A driver. A security guard. A pick me up artist. I have options.
Same time I can spend time with my girl gang and I know that lot envies me as I travel the world and get accolades.
Do i feel empty inside? No. But but my married friends sure do.
Its protecting their turf in the name of protecting traditions.
It challenges their bored husbands and their worldview.
Men are quite easy btw, if you need a quick fix, even the taken ones will agree in a heartbeat. You just need to make a move.
Single women with or without children are way happier than people who got married for the sake of it and were then pressured into parenting their husbands who they don't even love that much. It is much easier to have a few difficult conversations and protect your independence than to add a new person who will take over your life. Unless you want the new person of course.
Sperm donor and IVF are definitely on the table OP if you cannot find a man who is mature enough to be a partner to a woman who is in charge of her own life. And trust me, it is so much more fun being friends with the kind of people who don't judge single mothers. This includes some married people also. It will be uncomfortable initially but after that comes joy and freedom.
Options mentioned by you are still ahead of our times. How many single women or men do you know who had a child (through scientific methods) without a father. Adoption by single women is also still very difficult unless you are a celebrity and your own family won’t allow it. Pets cannot be an alternative to children. My personal view. They are a separate category and should be treated as such.
If you want a child it’s better to try and find a partner who agrees with your values and beliefs. Indian society is too backward and conservative still for single parents.
If you cannot find a partner than devote your time to your parents and to society. Or simply travel and enjoy life. But always take care of your health and mental wellbeing. Life is too short to overthink as we have seen through recent events.
But I am more interested in the options ahead. Adoption? Sperm donor and IVF? Forever childless? Dog mother? Cat mother? Still hoping to find a soulmate? Maybe devote spare time to politics and social service?
Curious because of the high numbers of women lawyers in this category I see, compared with women engineers or doctors or designers or MBAs, that’s all.