We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
1. Overlap with Chartered Accountancy/Big-4 Practice:
IDT has traditionally been a stronghold of chartered accountants and tax consultants. A significant portion of IDT compliance and advisory work lies in accounting, classification, and procedural interpretation—areas where CAs have historically dominated. This overlap can make one hesitant to invest heavily in building IDT teams, as the space is already highly competitive and rate-sensitive.
2. Lower Billing Rates Compared to Other Practice Areas:
Despite being complex and technical, IDT often doesn’t command the same billing rates as other areas like corporate litigation, arbitration, or regulatory work. This perception of lower commercial return can make firms less inclined to prioritize IDT as a core offering.
3. Perceived "Technical" Nature:
IDT involves detailed rules, notifications, circulars, and frequent changes in tax positions. Some law firms view it as more "technical" or compliance-heavy, rather than purely legal or strategic—leading to a perception that it lacks the glamour or strategic depth of constitutional or commercial litigation. That said, forward-looking firms are increasingly recognizing the value of a robust IDT practice, especially as GST-related issues reach higher courts and the need for sophisticated legal strategy grows. Those who position themselves well in this space early will likely see long-term dividends.
It’s true that tax, particularly IDT, is considered a niche area. That said, it is not necessarily a trap — provided you are strategic about how you use the opportunity. If you don’t have a compelling alternative offer at the moment, I would recommend accepting the PPO. Use the year to build a strong foundation while tactically positioning yourself for a transition. Here's how:
1. Within your current team, actively seek opportunities with corporate or disputes work. For instance, if a client has a contractual dispute or transaction, try to assist your team on those aspects. Partners are more likely to allocate such work within their team.
1. 2. If your firm has a corporate team, understand how transaction documents like Share Purchase Agreements or Business Transfer Agreements are structured and not limit your understanding to tax clauses.
2. 3. While customs classification assignments may be mundane for you, they are often entry points into broader regulatory analysis — environmental, consumer, BIS, FSSAI, etc. These areas feed directly into regulatory, risk, and corporate advisory work. Learning to navigate these laws adds weight to your profile when considering a switch.
3. 4. IDT is more deeply connected to industrial operations — whether it’s understanding origin rules in trade, structuring global supply chains, or applying sector-specific regulations (e.g., in manufacturing, FMCG, pharma). This kind of industry-aligned exposure is less common in direct tax and could be a differentiator when you later apply to in-house roles or boutique practices.
4.
5. After a year of building skills and relationships, you will be in a better position to explore internal movements or lateral opportunities in Tier 1 or Tier 2 firms. Transitions are not uncommon — firms appreciate associates who are well-trained, adaptable, and proactive.