We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
i work at a smaller firm and although not always reliable, sometimes chat gpt and claude etc really help
i would obviously never put in confidential information into it
but for things like paraphrasing, or sometimes research it is useful
the only thing is that it can’t be used blindly and always have to fact check so yes being careful is key.
but i was discussing this with someone from big law and they said that they make fun of people who use ai
i want to know genuinely, do lawyers really don’t find it useful
and if they do then why the shame and shade
if the resource is available we should learn how to make the best use of it
is my friend making shit or is this the case with big law firms
do you ppl really don’t use ai at all?